"We have ceded so many of the core operations of our lives and institutions to tech, we must recognise that strong encryption isn’t the enemy of security β€” it *is* security." - Signal President
@Mer__edith for the Financial Times on the war on encryption

https://www.ft.com/content/a934150f-e0f5-4e75-a2d1-a3671ea52ca0

The war on encryption is dangerous

Government demands to access encrypted data via back doors will leave it vulnerable to hacks, breaches and theft

Financial Times

@signalapp i'm going to be a replyenby here for a sec

you do realize anonymity is a friend of security, and you're actively sabotaging your users' anonymity with your hard phone & phone number requirement?

you've built a great app but that choice of basing your account system on phone numbers makes it nonviable for the sensitive activities encryption is most nessesary for

@soop The phone number requirement exists to prevent spam. You don't have to share your number with your contacts though, that's why user names exist.
@Andromxda @soop the addition of usernames is the thing that makes signal viable for use among people who aren't my immediate friends and family, although I still use it primarily for that purpose. An architecture like Matrix or xmpp where it's username@domain and you just sign up for it like any old thing is still preferable although doing that will also controlling for spam is a task needing a solution
@fluffykittycat Matrix is full of spammers. XMPP (in my experience) was able to avoid spam, due to just being obscure and irrelevant.