I am not a fan of Tesla/Elon but are you sure that no human driver would fall for this?

Lets assume that a human driver would fall for it, for sale of argument.

Would that make it a good idea to potentially run over a kid just because a human would have to, when we have a decent option to do better than human senses?

What makes you assume that a vision based system performs worse than the average human? Or that it can’t be 20 times safer?

I think the main reason to go vision-only is the software complexity of merging mixed sensor data. Radar or Lidar alone also have their limitations.

I wish it was a different company or that Musk would sell Tesla. But I think they are the closest to reaching full autonomy. Let’s see how it goes when FSD launches this year.