I was gonna reply to this person but then it occurred to me that I couldn't possibly have anything to say to someone with their head this far up their own asshole. I will however repost it to mock them relentlessly:
"I know you might construe this as a joke but this post really rubs me the wrong way. As in, you might walk up to the person and help them find a proper way to vent their frustration, but instead you allow violence to exist and propagate."
Of course the person who posted this has nothing to say about THAT violence, only that not turning people over to the gestapo for damaging inanimate objects is somehow "violent."
"First they came for the trade unionists and I totally ratted out my neighbor because tragic though it may be, we are a nation ruled by laws..."
I'm exhausted with the dissonance over the concept of violence and how it's the most moral side in a conflict's responsibility to avoid it all costs.
This same fallacy is applied against Ukraine. As if a free nation doesn't have the right to defend it's borders.
It is moral to defend ourselves, our friends, our neighbors, our families.
It is moral to deprive these hateful people of their ill-gotten wealth and power.
It is moral to resist.
AnarchoNinaWrites
Matt Hall
ꟻꟻAИ ᗡAT // moved, see profile
Demin 