They're not what they pretend to be!
They're not what they pretend to be!
I can survive using a different service for my podcasts. So this sounds like a good shout. But I’m impressed by the fact they supposedly have as many tracks as Spotify.
Will chase this down.
I think using anotger service for podcasts is important Podcasts are free, but Spotify has been trying to hijack the scene and ruin it for everyone.
Personally I like AntennaPod.
Ok but serious question, I don’t want to personally manage my music library on a server. For movies and TV this is fine, I consume a couple of these a day but if I want a steady stream of new music streaming apps have made all this very easy and very convenient.
When my 4 year old yells out in the car for a specific song, will these cover it?
Duder, you are not wrong. But I also am a) lazy b) busy with a tiny kid c) unlikely to fairly apportion my patronage if left to my own devices.
I hear you. I agree with you. But, in a perfect world, I need to find a service that at least ostensibly aligns with my ideals and allows me centralize my expenses in this area.
I’m going to look into this. You come bearing dark news if this is true. Thank you for typing this out.
I’d rather pay cents to everyone whose music I enjoy
I listen to a lot of music. a lot a lot. a few years ago, according to Spotify, I listened more than 99.5% users in my country. and when out of curiosity, I took my listening stats and used the publicly available info on Spotify’s payouts to estimate how much I contributed, it turned out that my most listened artist barely got a dollar from me during that year.
If true, disturbing.
Spotify is also not good.
They arbitrarily mute playing albums instead of Spotify playlists and you aren’t allowed to unmute them until you skip forward or backwards.
Downloads are a total shit show to SD cards even though it has been logged as a bug for around 8+ years.
They insert AI-generated bullshit slop into Spotify playlists to avoid having to pay royalties.
They pay artists one of the lowest (Pandora is lowest) in the industry and have arbitrary threshold to not pay artists until they hit a certain amount of streams per month. Then when they hit that threshold, they don’t back-pay them for total streams, but instead begin counting streams for payment after that threshold that resets monthly.
They partner with AI “battlefield tracking” companies trying to build the tracking machine from “the dark knight”.
They give a bunch of money to very right wing organizations.
Really the only good thing about Spotify is Spotify connect.
Buying from, and supporting the artist directly, IMO.
Many European metal bands host their own webshop selling their merchandise, records, cassettes and CDs; many small and independent musicians sell their songs on Bandcamp (US based website that does take a cut from each payment, 15% I believe goes to Bandcamp, so that is something to keep in mind)
That’s something you could recreate with a scrobbling service like last.fm (don’t use last.fm though, they are owned by CBS).
A quick Google search leads me to ListenBrains, which is also American, but operated by a non-profit.
I’ve used neither service and my music listening habits never relied on algorithmic recomendations, so I could totally be talking out of my ass here. But it could be worth a look.
I find Bandcamp at least a great way to discover especially smaller musicians!
But I totally get what you mean, though. You can’t have that experience buying from artist’s sites.
What the actual fuck? How did I not know about this? I mean… I want to pay for my music streaming, but for downloads this has changed my fucking life.
THANK. YOU.
Radio has been mostly bought out by corporations which seem to air more ads than music.
I’ve got a college radio station for alt rock in my area though that has great music with lots of variety and very few ads.