Council housing when?
Council housing when?
Some townships and counties have strict regulations and housing authorities which make coops and communal housing difficult, rarely intentionally but often as a result of requiring liability and responsibility for repairs and outcomes.
That said, there is a big push in a lot of cities such as Denver which is allowing more options.
To the occupant, “Land Contracts” are probably the most rent-like alternatives to actual rent.
I would draw a big target on institutional investors, by jacking property taxes through the roof, while issuing “homestead” exemptions to owner occupants. As soon as we do that, every landlord (who doesn’t live on the property) is going to get hit with a massive tax bill…
OR
… they are going to find some way to make their “tenant” qualify as the “owner”.
Here’s where “Land Contracts” come in. These are a form of seller financing. They are recorded by the county, much like a deed. The “buyer” is considered the owner.
With a land contract, you pay a fixed monthly payment, much like a mortgage. That payment normally doesn’t change for the life of the contract: You aren’t going to face a steep rent hike every year.
For the first three years, you are free to walk away from the property, just like leaving a rental. Ownership simply reverts to the seller.
After three years, your previous payments are considered the “down payment” on the property. The contract converts to a traditional mortgage. You continue to make the same payments, but now, you have equity in the home.
So, you can get the short-term flexibility of renting, but if you realize you’ve settled down, you’re already well on your way to ownership.
Landlords get a way to claim that the property is occupied by the “owner”, and avoid the massive tax hike.
Adopting this, the only properties that will remain “for rent” will be the spare units in duplexes, triplexes, and quadplexes, where the landlord occupies one of the units.
Land Contracts and Contracts for Deed aren’t considered mortgages so they lack tax incentives as well as legal protections for buyers and sellers, but yes I do agree that a long term contract beats a monthly rental agreement in terms of locking in a rate.
Sometimes you can get trapped in a contract that would disqualify all your payments up to that point if it doesn’t have terms about cashing in your equity unless you pay the full amount due via selling to a third party or getting a bank loan with which you can repay via renting or selling your property like some sort of sick landlord carousel.
I definitely don’t know if I would “recommend” this route for people who aren’t well-learned in matters of real estate, if they do go this route then I absolutely insist they have a trustworthy attorney act as intermediary for the transaction.
Thank you for expanding this discussion.
They could also tie it to occupancy. If a functional residence goes more than half the year without someone living in it, property tax is quintupled.
There’s danger to writing such a law correctly, unfortunately. I recall something in Ecuador where people were leaving extensions to their home just barely unfinished so that they could avoid certain residence laws until they had a buyer.
Wait? There’s NZ memes /community here?
Also peak meme!
Sorry, I’m new here. Apparently I haven’t enabled my notifications.
But yes it is embarrassing, for him and for us
“It’s the market” is another way of saying “because I can”.
They don’t have to raise the rent to match the market, the market is simply a signal to them that if they lost you by raising the rent, they could potentially replace you for the same or higher rent.
They could ignore that and leave your rent alone. They don’t. It’s a choice.
I mean, every year my rent increases, which is not equally compensated for by what I earned at work. So every year I have less to spend each month.
The thing that pisses me off is that I’m not Asking to be able to afford a house. I already gave up on that a long time ago. I’m only asking to be able to stay at a place that I’ve been living in for 10 years. And by the way, moving is also super expensive. On top of that, let’s say I did move to a place where the rent is cheaper initially, the rent is gonna be increasing every year there too.
I’m just trying to live a stable, modest life without having a panic attack every time I see her, no tape to my door (which usually signifies a rent increase notification).
I really wish something could be done about this.
Omg wow ty for explaining basic economics to me!! Where ever would a poor little girlie like me be without your words of wisdom! You’re so right tho, I’m soooo entitled!!! Can you IMAGINE wanting a place to sleep and eat?! The fucking audacity of it.
Great advice btw all the povos struggling to make ends meet should use the savings they don’t have to quit their jobs in the city and move to a “town of 3000” where they can be jobless, without a support network (because poor people famously don’t have dependants and can just fuck off anytime) AND be poor!! Fantastic advice king.
Also empathy is woke and real men would rather kill themselves than ask for help 🥰 that sound about right to u?
You’re part of the problem that increases the disparity in wealth, yet you have the audacity to attack people who criticize you for it.
You’re entitled. You’re greedy. You’re a proud consumer. Instead of getting mad at me for point out these facts, you should start to value different things so you’re no longer part of the problem.
You accuse me of not seeing nuance, but turn around and do the same yourself.
I bet that sounded nice in your head, but it doesn’t really hold any relevance here.
The thing that pisses me off is that I’m not Asking to be able to afford a house. I already gave up on that a long time ago.
Sigh. This is part of the problem. We need to value ownership more than renting.
I can’t afford a down payment. You can’t buy a decent house in Cali for less than a mil. I get it. Paying rent sucks (with the advantage of not having to pay your repairs). But I can’t afford a house at this point. Just can’t afford to save enough money. So although I know it’s more optimal, I’m okay with paying rent in the current market. I just can’t deal with the constant increases.
I think you get my point though. Paying rent is not optimal, but a person with a decent job should be able to afford it.
It’s a Wikipedia day, today.
“Everyone elses profits” means other landlords and property owners, not people who plan on living in their home.
Why does being a landlord need to be profitable? Why does bring privlaged enough to own a human right come with the right to free money?
because capitalism needs to function like cancer. shit’s built on old imperialist logics, where you must always be claiming more. red queen’s race bullshit. or cancer; pick your metaphor.
it must be profitable because while productivity increases, due to imperial conquest and advancing technology, the profits of the owning classes (remember; this is the literal definition of capitalism-value being produced by owners rather than workers. yes it’s insane, they are insane, this system is insane.) must also increase.
the fact the working class have no more to squeeze from just means we get closer and closer to slaves, which is maybe intentional, maybe just a cool bonus for them.
there’s a cool poem that explains it. check out part 2 poets.org/poem/howl-parts-i-ii
Not necessarily true. There are powerful cultural forces at play that they’re not willing to acknowledge, yet alone overcome.
We’re kind of in the same boat. We think that if we have more, then we deserve more before those who have less. That’s just what these people are doing, only they’re doing it way better than us.
Abolish Capitalism When?
The core problem is capitalism, landlording is merely a symptom of capitalism.
I keep telling my friends rent is going up every 2 years.
Looks like it’s about that time.
Doesn’t work if landlords just buy that too.
Needs proper regulation