Academia could indeed become the bedrock of a more democratic, pluralistic and progressive social media, but "it would require universities, as well as sector-wide organisations such as funding councils and learned societies, to recognise and take a stance in relation to these issues in a way they have thus far failed to do."

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2025/03/03/bluesky-will-trap-academics-in-the-same-way-twitter-x-did/

Pretty much exactly what we have also pointed out:
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.230207

Bluesky will trap academics in the same way Twitter/X did - Impact of Social Sciences

Commercial platforms & social media companies are designed to maximise switching costs to retain users. Will Bluesky do the same for academics?

Impact of Social Sciences - Maximizing the impact of academic research
@brembs - We shouldn't conflate "academics" and "universities". Universities are unfortunately run by administrators who are very cautious and don't want to do anything that would disturb their donors. Many academics are more willing to speak out and take a stance on touchy issues. It would be great if academics could take back their universities, but in many case it's very late for this: the administrative class has taken over!

@johncarlosbaez

This is true for too man universities these days, you are correct.
And yet, I think even the most detached admins would have a hard time resisting a global push, wouldn't they?

@brembs - a global push for what, exactly? What exactly would you want universities, acting as institutions, to do? Whether it's likely depends a lot on the details. I would love to push any action that has a chance to work.

@johncarlosbaez

We have outlined the general goal for a scholarly infrastructure in Fig. 3 here:

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.230206

One straightforward approach would be to start with the journals, as tons of money are locked up there. Most of that money is unnecessary and a large chunk ouright harmful, see, e.g.

https://f1000research.com/articles/10-20/v2
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037/full

E.g., the EU is backing this concept:

https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023/05/23/council-calls-for-transparent-equitable-and-open-access-to-scholarly-publications/

The EU is moving to position ORE along these lines:

https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3603e219-6a65-11ef-a8ba-01aa75ed71a1/language-en

@johncarlosbaez

One way to push institutions in this direction is for all of us to contact our representatives. I have started writing something that could one day be used as a template:

https://cryptpad.fr/doc/#/2/doc/edit/C65EM+kOfMsSklipy5iSYWWE/

Still needs some work, though, just to show the direction.

Encrypted Document

CryptPad: end-to-end encrypted collaboration suite