Proposed new Laws of Robotics:
1. A machine must never show an advertisement to a human, or through inaction allow an advertisement to be shown to a human
If I think of a second Law of Robotics I'll let you know
Proposed new Laws of Robotics:
1. A machine must never show an advertisement to a human, or through inaction allow an advertisement to be shown to a human
If I think of a second Law of Robotics I'll let you know
Based on replies in this thread, here is an alternate proposed "three laws of robotics".
1. A machine must never show an advertisement to a human, or through inaction allow an advertisement to be shown to a human.
2. A machine shall never use more power to perform a job than would be used by an equivalent human.
3. A machine must never present or refer to itself as though it were human, or through inaction allow a human to mistake it for one.
[Post 1 of 2]
@Adept As noted in my followup post to that one, I believe implicitly encoded in rule three is the belief that humans will never manage to create actual machine sentience.
Ideologies are based on both values and assumptions
@mcc ok, I guess I understood, but disagree on the ambition of the laws then.
The biologist in me insists I say something about the difference between sentience and sapience.
Anything that feels is sentient, a self aware thinking being is sapient. The line is very blurry, of course. We are not that different from other animals, just "more so".
@mcc the Large Language Model approach is this moment's Tulip Mania bubble. Don't let it set your expectations too low.
This approach will not result in actual intelligence, let alone sapience, but it's not the one possibility.