Harris campaign ordered organizers to ignore voters who asked about Gaza.

https://lemm.ee/post/54923600

Harris campaign ordered organizers to ignore voters who asked about Gaza. - lemm.ee

Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/uncommitted-leaders-stand-2024-strategy-trump-floats-gaza-takeover-rcna190782 [https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/uncommitted-leaders-stand-2024-strategy-trump-floats-gaza-takeover-rcna190782]

Let’s consider the counterfactual: is it possible that this was a calculated decision about a complex topic and that abdicating led to a more positive outcome than not?

The subtext of this post seems to be: if only harris hadn’t ignored the Gaza problem! And I reject that as a premise

By the way, let’s consider another counterfactual: is it possible that Harris (the sitting VP) was privy to more information about the conflict than voters were?

Genocide is a complex topic?

What positive outcome pray tell? Losing some voters for good and depressing turnout? I thought Trump was a threat to democracy, why did Harris allow him to win?

A far simpler explanation is that AIPAC bought politicians of both sides.

You are clearly a genocide denier if you are merely referring to it as a “problem”.

Amos Goldberg: 'What is happening in Gaza is a genocide because Gaza does not exist anymore'

Given the scale of the massacres and destruction perpetrated by the Israeli army in Gaza, the Israeli historian, a specialist of the Holocaust, says in an interview with Le Monde that his country 'criminally overreacted' to the October 7 massacres.

Le Monde
Dems that said “ceasefire would be nice” and “two state solution” after Oct 7th faced the most expensive/funded primary races in history. The ones who’se primary opponents never mentioned Israel despite all the AIPAC money that funded them won.

It is unfortunate. The uncommitted had low bar requests that Harris could have verbally acknowledge without any true commitments and that still was too much.

During negotiations with the DNC and the Harris campaign, we were repeatedly told by interlocutors that Harris couldn’t meet any of our basic requests (a policy shift from Biden, a Palestinian speaker at the DNC, a statement distinguishing herself from Trump on Israel, or even a meeting with Michigan families who lost loved ones to Israeli bombs) because of AIPAC-aligned politicians like Fetterman, who might take to TV, rile up suburban white and Jewish voters, and fracture the party’s coalition in a swing state.

xcancel.com/_waleedshahid/…/1887595942100062234

Yes. As my other comment mentioned, DNC both from pro Israel ideology, and “party unity”, needed to support the genocide, and other swing states were at stake. Fetterman now supportive of Trump is icing on the cake.