@molly0xfff It's a little disappointing to see the author give up on Wikipedia's behalf in the closing sentence:
> The free encyclopedia will become too toxic to sustain.
Maybe it's just awkward editing, and it belongs in the paragraph above it—but this conclusion feels quite hostile, all but asking people to divest from the project.
It's sad, but the experience that many occasional Wikipedia contributors have is there is a cabal of "in editors", that seem to orchestrate the deletionist movement to automatically remove any edits or new pages, to preserve an archaic view that Wikipedia should mimic a page-bound and somehow printable version of an encyclopedia.
I assume this is because there is no mechanism to support a bifurcated or multi-furcated reality in the Wikipedia/Wikimedia software.
So, IMHO, Wikipedia is stewing in it's own broth, by truncating the long tail of possible well meaning contributors, and thereby allowing focus groups, with possibly malicious intent, to hold sway in edits and arbitration.
@molly0xfff Heritage foundation is imitating China, not fighting it.
MAGA is imitating Russia, not fighting it.