Wyoming Republicans’ anti-abortion bill inadvertently targets chemotherapy and surgeries | Wyoming | The Guardian

 …Wyoming attorneys and healthcare law professionals at Boston University, George Washington University, Johns Hopkins and Pittsburgh University, say the problem is that a broad swath of healthcare procedures can be considered to cause “harm by design.

“There’s a slew of medical procedures, surgeries, treatments that can have potentially positive outcomes but may also cause harm in the short period or as an unintended consequence,” the Wyoming attorney Abigail Fournier said.

“It’s scary to me, because I think it could be interpreted to be very limiting in terms of what healthcare providers can do.”

Wyoming’s constitutional right to healthcare stems from a 2012, voter-ratified constitutional amendment stating that “the right to make healthcare decisions is reserved to the citizens of the state of Wyoming”. Tom Lubnau, Wyoming attorney and former Republican speaker of the state house, helped author the amendment. He sees much of the current legislature as having “tunnel vision”, and a fixation on passing social issue legislation that ignores constitutionality…

“Healthcare decisions are the individual’s in Wyoming. And that’s what the freedom amendment says,” Lubnau said. “Butt out of my decisions, and let me take care of myself…”

Source: Wyoming Republicans’ anti-abortion bill inadvertently targets chemotherapy and surgeries | Wyoming | The Guardian

Wyoming | The Guardian

Latest news, sport, business, comment, analysis and reviews from the Guardian, the world's leading liberal voice

@nedhamsonsecondlineviewofthenews.com
Doctors don't respond to a serment of Hypocrat? Respect for human life: The physician commits to respecting and protecting human life, to not intentionally harming their patients, and to acting in their best interest. So they prefer to give death to a pregnant woman of few weeks instead of save her? For what? She will die with no treatment and the foetus also.