Traduzco este toot al castellano porque creo que es muy útil y necesario en el momento que estamos atravesando:
«Como socióloga, necesito decirte que el hecho de que te sientas abrumado es el objetivo.
1) La marea de más de 200 órdenes ejecutivas en los primeros días de Trump ejemplifica la "doctrina del shock" de Naomi Klein: usar el caos y la crisis para impulsar cambios radicales mientras las personas están demasiado desorientadas como para resistir de forma efectiva. Esto no es la política de siempre, es una explotación estratégica de los límites cognitivos.
2) El teórico de los medios McLuhan predijo esto: cuando los seres humanos se enfrentan a una sobrecarga de información, se vuelven pasivos y desvinculados. La ráfaga de órdenes ejecutivas crea un cuello de botella cognitivo, haciendo casi imposible para los ciudadanos y los medios analizar minuciosamente cada una de las políticas.
3) La teoría de elaboración de programas políticos explica la estrategia: cuando múltiples grandes políticas compiten simultáneamente por la atención, se fragmenta la conversación pública. Los medios tradicionales no pueden seguir el ritmo, llevando a una cobertura superficial.
¿El resultado? Un debilitamiento del control democrático y una reducción de la participación pública.
1/2
Paul E. (@[email protected])
My wife and many of her friends are sociologists. She forwarded me this text that one of her friends found. Apparently it was also written by a sociologist. I found it helpful. Maybe you will too. "As a sociologist, I need to tell you that your being overwhelmed is the goal. 1/ The flood of 200+ executive orders in Trump's first days exemplifies Naomi Klein's "shock doctrine" - using chaos and crisis to push through radical changes while people are too disoriented to effectively resist. This isn't just politics as usual - it's a strategic exploitation of cognitive limits. 2/ Media theorist McLuhan predicted this: When humans face information overload, they become passive and disengaged. The rapid-fire executive orders create a cognitive bottleneck, making it nearly impossible for citizens and media to thoroughly analyze any single policy. 3/ Agenda-setting theory explains the strategy: When multiple major policies compete for attention simultaneously, it fragments public discourse. Traditional media can't keep up with the pace, leading to superficial coverage. The result? Weakened democratic oversight and reduced public engagement. What now? 1/ Set boundaries: Pick 2-3 key issues you deeply care about and focus your attention there. You can't track everything - that's by design. Impact comes from sustained focus, not scattered awareness. 2/ Use aggregators & experts: Find trusted analysts who do the heavy lifting of synthesis. Look for those explaining patterns, not just events. 3/ Remember: Feeling overwhelmed is the point. When you recognize this, you regain some power. Take breaks. Process. This is a marathon. 4/ Practice going slow: Wait 48hrs before reacting to new policies. The urgent clouds the important. Initial reporting often misses context 5/ Build community: Share the cognitive load. Different people track different issues. Network intelligence beats individual overload. Remember: They want you scattered. Your focus is resistance.” UPDATE: it seems that this Threads post is the origin of the above sentiment: https://www.threads.net/@itsjenniferwalter/post/DFIu3Q2q-5P While I don't love linking to Threads, I think it's important to give credit where credit is due. #resist #trump


