Every time I log into Fedi, I see another post with a guide called something like "Activist's Guide to Smartphones" or "Phone Security Guide for Protesters," and every single one of these assumes that the threat model is the kind of police force that exists under liberal democracy where the law will afford significant protections to protesters. The world is changing, and these guides not only fail to address the threat of an actively hostile fascistic anti-democratic occupying force (I refer here to the police), but such guides generally are limited to "what" and "how" but miss the more critical "why."

If you believe that you are facing fascism (or even something close to it), can I please please please convince you to read something written by anarchists who have faced serious repression and are trying to convey just how much phones can lead to the imprisonment of you and your friends for even things that are allegedly "legal."

https://opsec.riotmedicine.net/downloads#mobile-phone-security

Downloads

Riot Medicine
@hakan_geijer I know enough tech to say that there is one fundamental rule of avoiding surveillance on your phone: Don't. There are too many different ways it can be compromised, if you are a person of sufficient importance that someone in government actually cares to try. If you want secure communications, the first rule is to get a Real Computer which runs a software environment you and you alone can control.

@Qybat @hakan_geijer sorry but this is a really wild take.

while I love linux desktop it is nowhere close to the security you can have on mobile devices (mainly by using graphene).

if (big if) you can really control the whole software environment you also need to audit that. And then we completely disregard physical attack vectors and of course as op mentioned non technical vectors.

you cant use general advice in these cases anyway, assess your threat model and act based on that.