@kmcshane "Mature definition" kek

The fact that you use the phrase "less privileged" while also setting up a false dichotomy power with "protect & uplift" vs "aggressive & harm" shows how you misunderstand the concept.

Those two are the same thing, just within a specific frame and from the dichotomous point of view.

To care for something or someone in need of protection requires aggression and power to both deter and overcome whatever is posing a threat with harm. You cannot hold that accountable because that will deter the protection itself. The more Daniel Penny cases, the more chilling effect it will have.

In simpler terms, when me victim, man aggressive and harm good. When me perpetrate, man aggressive and harm bad.

So, if you stood up and asked Mr. Big Zucc this question, he would be quite right in staring at you like the idiot you are, and telling you (and by proxy your constituents agreeing with you) that you're fired.