APCA is no longer part of WCAG3. You can still use it, but for conformance (legal, policy, etc.) reasons you will still need to follow WCAG2. It’s possible to satisfy both in most cases.

https://mastodon.social/@marcedwards/113778629472354171

Lots of questions about this. Notes:

• I’m NOT a member of working group;

• Went away in January 2023: https://github.com/w3c/silver/pull/663#issuecomment-1408914402

• Disappeared in July 2023 WCAG3 working draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2023/WD-wcag-3.0-20230724/#color-and-contrast

• APCA was only ever exploratory, and July 2023 update explained removals: https://web.archive.org/web/20230726204602/https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/wcag3-intro/#status-exploratory-draft

• Anybody promoting it since then (or, frankly, before, and especially now) failed to do due diligence. It was only ever draft, always temporary.

Visual contrast by michael-n-cooper · Pull Request #663 · w3c/silver

Remove guideline for visual contrast of text, related content, and early draft methods.

GitHub

@aardrian

APCA is part of the APCA Readability Criterion, an open standard available from Inclusive Reading Technologies, Inc. A California non-profit, dedicated to science-based standards and research to improve readability for all.

https://www.readtech.org/ARC/

APCA Readability Criterion • Contrast

The APCA Readability Criterion (ARC) provides a range of recommendations for making visual content on illuminated displays more accessible to all users, especially with visual impairments

Inclusive Reading Technologies