New York Times rejects Quaker ad for calling Israel’s actions “genocide”

https://lemmy.world/post/24041890

New York Times rejects Quaker ad for calling Israel’s actions “genocide” - Lemmy.World

After receiving the text for the ad quoted above, a representative from the advertising team suggested AFSC use the word “war” instead of “genocide” – a word with an entirely different meaning both colloquially and under international law. When AFSC rejected this approach, the New York Times Ad Acceptability Team sent an email that read in part: “Various international bodies, human rights organizations, and governments have differing views on the situation. In line with our commitment to factual accuracy and adherence to legal standards, we must ensure that all advertising content complies with these widely applied definitions.”

My goofy ass thought it meant the oatmeal guys

I don’t think there’s anything “goofy ass” about that. Quaker Oats Company was explicitly named (and used a logo) to cause people to make that mistake.
It’s not intentionally deceptive, they literally called it that because one of the founders admired the Quakers.

qualities describing Quakers, such as integrity, honesty, and purity, were traits that he wanted customers to associate with the company’s product

I dunno how else to describe that but intentionally deceptive.

I dunno how else to describe that but intentionally deceptive.

Yeah, it IS part of marketing after all.