Her Mental Health Treatment Was Helping. That’s Why Insurance Cut Off Her Coverage.
Her Mental Health Treatment Was Helping. That’s Why Insurance Cut Off Her Coverage.
I’m a mental health provider and medical necessity review irritates the hell out of me sometimes. I still think it’s absolutely necessary though. I’ve seen countless examples of therapists that want to keep working with people that are doing well. Meanwhile, someone else who really needs it can’t find a provider.
I realize that won’t be a popular opinion here but whatever.
The point of the article was about how the patients in question were only doing better(ish) due to intensive help from the therapists and still needed time.
From a lay persons view “better” does not equal doesn’t need continued therapy by a long shot and I’d rather have people use more therapy than they need than the other way around due to the outsize harms of getting that decision wrong.
such arrogance, such lack of self awareness or empathy. such projection. read the room clown. “i know this will be unpopular” isn’t a magic phrase that will make the unsupported things you say in direct contradiction to our lived experiences as patients and insurance subjects somehow valid. blackstone’s reasoning applies here.
I’m tempted to say some uncharitable things about the reputational damage your statements tend to do to your profession, but i would just be rehashing the comments you’ve made, and i think people already get the gist.