Andrea Junker 
Let me put it this way: If you’re for a ban on abortion but against funding childhood cancer research, you are many things, but “pro-life” is not one of them.
OddMinus1@Strandjunker I like to replace the words with pro-quantity vs pro-quality.
sobroquetThe Computer-Weaponized War on Women’s Human-Rights with The Rise of Reproductive Surveillance - An Exhaustive Compendium
https://tinyurl.com/3w6hrujv
Janie Karma S 🏳️🌈🖖🏿
MakanaBoy@Strandjunker I'll never understand how the F pro-life can apply to bans on abortion but feeding, housing, clothing, providing healthcare, guidance/education, clean water, jobs are not considered pro-life at all.
alexraffa 
@MakanaBoy @Strandjunker it's because their moral framework is dictated by out of time irrational religion....
inamruzui@Strandjunker pro-control
patcanfield@Strandjunker Children should Die Naturally! I won't contribute to their dying Unnaturally!
The Febrile Muse@Strandjunker Or for death penalty
IamRoebuck@Strandjunker Youre simply comparing the subjective versus objective nature of being “pro-life.”
If everyone has the right to make their own choices, that they should! what does being “pro-life” actually encompass?
Supporting initiatives like childhood cancer research, healthcare access, and resources for families could arguably align with this philosophy.
Meanwhile, war may be framed as prolonging civilian lives, but it also results in the deaths of thousands of soldiers
@Strandjunker I recall a South African comedian who had a routine comparing the contradiction re being anti abortion and pro death penalty to a fisherman competitive enough to throw small fishes caught on a hook back into the water.