The average age of homebuyers in the US is now 56

The median age of first-time buyers is 38 (up from 34 last year)

The share of first-time buyers dropped from 32 to 24%

The median home price is now $435,000, which is up THIRTY NINE PERCENT since 2020

This is so astoundingly fucked

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/11/04/homebuyer-average-age-rises-to-56-amid-rising-homeownership-costs.html

The average age of U.S. homebuyers jumps to 56—homes are 'wildly unaffordable' for young people, real estate expert says

With home prices up nearly 40% since 2020, buyers are now wealthier and older, making them more likely to outbid younger buyers with all-cash offers.

CNBC
@chartier That 39% inflation since 2020 is nuts.
We like to think that California sets trends for the country, but it's not in a good way this time.
In my neck of the woods high prices have been driven by decades of NIMBYism and limited construction, but I didn't think those were such big factors nationally.

@14mission @chartier I don't have the numbers - alas - but I really would like to see a proper analysis on this. Because seeing how many homes are bought by people who already have one (or more) properties, I have a strong feeling that a lot of this price gauge is driven by "investment" buyers, pushing young families out of the market and into rental.

One reason why it makes sense to make buying houses for investment a lot more expensive.

@JorisMeys @14mission @chartier I’m sure real estate investment companies and rich folks are part of the problem, and I have no problem making those investments less profitable. But I think the larger issue is the US just hasn’t been building anywhere close to the amount of houses we would need to house everyone. Look how little has been built since 2008 compared to every year before: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/HOUST
New Privately-Owned Housing Units Started: Total Units

View data of the total number of new privately owned homes that began construction in a given month, used as an indicator of economic strength.

@JorisMeys @14mission @chartier not to mention, building more housing is a great way to make these people buying housing as an investment lose out. It’s a win win for everyone except the rich and corporations who’ve invested in housing, which is why they fight it so hard, and why it’s so disappointing that a lot of leftists dismiss it as a viable solution to the housing crisis
@bwebster @JorisMeys @chartier The kind of leftists who are religious recyclers and drive electric cars, but fight tooth and nail against the possibility of poor people (or people just one rung down the ladder from them) moving into their town.

@14mission @bwebster @chartier all hail Mitch McConnell, the saviour of the poor :-) yes obviously, Harris' plan to build more houses is very bad. Trump's plan of removing unspecified regulations way more solid.

I always wondered how obvious grifters got elected, but every day I witness how insanely naive ppl are.

@bwebster @JorisMeys @14mission But if we’re talking sheer number of houses, I keep seeing stats like this—that we have *millions* of empty houses and around 550K homeless.

It sounds like we have enough, but the problem is that most of them are owned by the wrong people. Is that a decent reading of the situation?

https://www.self.inc/info/empty-homes/

Homelessness & Empty Homes: Trends Since 2010 | Self.

There are 45.9 empty properties per homeless person across the US. Have a look through historical changes and how each US state compares.

@chartier @JorisMeys @14mission Adam Conover has a great podcast episode about this topic if you want to do a deep dive: https://mastodon.social/@adamconover/113160466382837321

The short version is: an empty home is not necessarily a home that could help a homeless person. 1) it may not be where the homeless person is, and moving them there would take them away from a community they need to survive 2) there may not be jobs available for that person where that empty house is 3) (continued)

@chartier @JorisMeys @14mission 3) many empty homes are for sale. You need a small percentage of empty homes to make it possible for people to move without relying on someone dying to free up a home

The government could seize vacation homes and forcibly re-locate homeless people across the country to put them in these homes in areas with no jobs, but there are better ways to solve the housing crisis (like building more housing)

@bwebster @14mission @chartier you mean investment dropped after the housing market crashed. It's indeed a multi faceted story, and you should look at vacancy rates vs houses on the markets as well.

The US could benefit from more affordable housing, but such socialist ideas are frowned upon. Building for the poor is not as profitable as scaring them with Mexicans eating cats.

https://usafacts.org/articles/how-many-vacant-homes-are-there-in-the-us/

How many vacant homes are there in the US?

Over 15 million American homes — approximately 10% of the country’s housing inventory — were vacant in 2022.

USAFacts