Brian Thompson’s killing sparks outrage over state of US healthcare

https://lemmy.world/post/22822259

Brian Thompson’s killing sparks outrage over state of US healthcare - Lemmy.World

Summary The killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson has ignited outrage over the state of U.S. healthcare. While his murder shocked many, online reactions highlighted public frustration with private insurers, citing denied care, high costs, and systemic bureaucracy. UnitedHealthcare, a major industry player, has faced scrutiny for practices perceived as prioritizing profit over patients. The attack, which appears premeditated, underscores rising tensions around healthcare inequality. Experts see this as part of a broader trend toward violence over societal disputes, reflecting deep dissatisfaction with the American healthcare system.

Experts see this as part of a broader trend toward violence over societal disputes, reflecting deep dissatisfaction with anger at the blatant corruption of the American healthcare system.

FTFY

That belies the shock also generated by the brutality of Thompson’s death.

It wasn't brutal. He died with no fear and very quickly. That's a lot better than many of the patients his company denied coverage for can say.

The news anchors / article writer had to say that because otherwise they get fired.
And, by nature of the corrupt system, lose their health insurance
People aren’t shocked by his death. We’re at the very least not surprised and unsympathetic. And many of us are positively giddy.
As much as I share the majority’s sentiment about this situation, I think he may have died with fear. If you see the uncensored video, he turns around and faces the shooter after the first shot. That explains why they say he was shot in the chest even though he appeared to be shot from behind. I guess the first shot was to the leg and the second to the chest. It’s also possible that he died too quickly to experience fear, even though he got to face his assassin.

Maybe you shouldn't have an accountant in charge of a "healthcare" company.

I'm sorry for the multiple comments. I have a lot of background and trauma related to dealing with health insurance companies. They are parasites sucking out the blood of those who can least afford it and ruining their lives when they can't pay the bills left over after they deny claims.

Parasites at least play an important role in their ecosystems. I have no (or too many) words to describe my hatred for people like this that commit social murder all the time.

Healthcare companies should only be allowed to operate under non-profit rules.

There should be no incentive for profit on people’s health.

Why do you hate America?

I don’t hate America any country. I hate some of what the people in power do to exploit. The country it happens in is irrelevant.

I think the thing I hate most is “rampant capitalism” capitalism should be domesticated.

You probably needed a /s
I hate using it... it kills the tone :/
It sucks to need it, you were downvoted when I saw your comment, though.
And forced to publicly report every thousandth of a cent. And their current administrators charged with crimes against humanity. L
And the thing is, the “trade” they inflict is just so amazingly unreasonable. The incredible misery they cause, replicated over so many people, and for truly no greater purpose than keeping up with the perverse status symbol competition amongst their hideous peers. Absolutely wild, unhinged, clearly malignant behavior.
This isn’t reddit. Its not an issue to segment comments logicly

UnitedHealthcare, a major industry player, has faced scrutiny for practices perceived as prioritizing profit over patients.

Perceived? Of course they prioritize profit over patients. They, along with every other capitalist firm, must prioritize profit over every other consideration. Everything is secondary to maximum, ever increasing profits.

Option 1: Vote for Democrats / vote for a woman for president to get incremental improvements to healthcare and society.
Americans: yawn

Option 2: Start murdering the powerful capitalist oligarchs which will lead to zero improvements in healthcare and society but fuels fantasies of revenge and temporarily feels good.
Americans: “Yay!”

Option 1’s incremental improvement to healthcare are negated by capitalism’s incremental exploitation of those “improvements.” They can fuck shit up faster than politics can fix it.

Option 2 ends in universal healthcare.

We didn’t even try Option 1 this time. It was too boring for most people to go out and vote. And then we had a vocal group decided to withhold votes based on their unbending principles.

I’m not holding my breath for Option 2 given we couldn’t even make Option 1 work. Since we’ve shown we can’t come together for each other, Option 2 is more likely to end in totalitarianism as the powerful react to the violence and/or in societal collapse as every person looks out only for himself.

We didn’t even try Option 1 this time.

Option 1 was “maintain the status quo”. Continue to suck in exactly the same way that we have been sucking for the past 60+ years.

as every person looks out only for himself.

That’s called “Democracy”.

If it’s not obvious to you that things sucked in distinctly different ways under Democrat and GOP rule, I doubt I’ll be able to convince you. Not to mention, the stark difference this next administration has from anything we’ve seen before.

If you don’t think we’ve ever made progress in this country, or that the Biden administration made only maintained the status quo, I guess that’s fine. You do you. But that’s not the case from what I’ve seen.

I am interested in how democracy is every person looking out for themselves. I can agree that any societal system has to account for self-preservation, but democracy itself is, as far as I understand, a tool to channel individual instincts toward improving things for everyone.

If it’s not obvious to you that things sucked in distinctly different ways under Democrat and GOP rule

Sure. There are distinct differences between the two.

There are also distinct differences in the different ways things sucked in the 1920s. There are distinct differences in the way things sucked in the 1980s. The distinctions you are talking about are trivial compared to the distinctions across the decades.

Neither Democrats nor Republicans are currently interested in the kind of reforms necessary to address the oligarchs. The difference in suckiness between the two is certainly distinct, but relatively insignificant. We need to tackle the bigger problems; the problems that Harris wasn’t capable or even interested in solving. We know we need to tackle those problems, which is why someone unable and/or unwilling to look at them gets a yawn.

Option 2 gives us an optimistic electorate. That “Yay!” is exactly what we need. The most pressing issue we need to address is Reagan’s tax policies. So much is resolved when we restore the measures we used to destroy the robber barons.

I agree with most, but not all, of your understanding of our situation. Sounds like you want things to get better. I hope your efforts are successful.
Let’s go ahead and not even pretend that any kind of healthcare reform would have happened during a Dick Cheney approved Harris administration.
I suppose we could pretend both sides are the same instead.

We didn’t even try Option 1 this time.

What exactly the fuck do you think four years of Biden was?

last time; not this time

“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” – Rita Mae Brown

And then the fucking neolibs wonder why Trump won.

Just because there are other options worth trying, doesn’t mean we should give up on also trying a peaceful option. If we elect better people, it’s not the same thing. If we strike, too, it’s not the same thing. We can augment rather than abandon. It’s more complicated, harder, and requires cunning and patience rather than mere brute force. Nothing has a guaranteed result, not even violence—especially with GOP/MAGA in power.
lol. god you people are trash. ‘suffer for longer because we want to take the HARDER route vs fixing the fucking problem.’

It’s like Richard Pryor said about crack:

Old white women see addicted kids in the ghetto and shrug “Well isn’t that terrible?”
Then crack arrives at their suburbs and they’re “OH MY GOD IT’S AN EPIDEMIC!”

Big bad drug dealer made Joey do drugs 🤡
Kid, you should just make a new username that’s just the clown emoji with how you use it. You have such shit takes that I assume you’re a child. This one isn’t wrong it’s just worthless. I hate seeing your name.
Harris didn't promise incremental improvements though. In the days leading up to the election she only promised regression and stagnation.
I’m not sure where you got that idea. Did you not read her platform or listen to her speak?
Did you not notice how democrats helped republicans shift the overton window further and further towards regressivism? There was never any incremental improvement, just concessions made to distract you from how both parties serve the same masters.

You and I don’t seem to agree on this. Maybe you’re just simplifying for the sake of this medium, so I’m missing some of your perspective.

But you do seem to want a more progressive society. I hope your efforts are successful.

I mean she promised to shift to the right compared to Biden, and build that fucking border wall. How is "I'm so right wing I'll include Republicans in my cabinet) anything other than regression?

… promised to shift to the right …

Source, please?

… include Republicans in my cabinet …

If both sides are already the same, how is this a shift?

I never said anything about both sides being the same. I was only criticizing Harris here.

“I’m so right wing…”

Yes, I was talking about Harris there, hence "I am" and not "we are". Also I never implied she's the same as bona fide Republicans, but she was definitely a shift to the right from Joe Biden.
I interpreted you putting those words in her mouth as you saying she’s as right wing as the other side.
Yes, and they’re spot on with their analysis. not a single one of her policies addressed the systemic issues afflicting our society atm. they were all small, pointless motions that would have not helped resolved the crippling wage suppression, the lack of decent health care. reminder: harris wanted khan gone as well.
Kamala Harris Didn’t Defend Lina Khan

Kamala Harris stayed silent during the election as big Democratic donors attacked chief antitrust regulator Lina Khan — at the same time Khan’s agency launched an investigation into the employer of Harris’s brother-in-law and top advisor.

What improvements did Democrats make in the past 4 years?

The last time a president made marginal improvements they introduced term limits to stop it happening again.

You couldn’t find anything?

  • all-time low for uninsured
  • unemployment has held below 4% for the longest stretch since the 1960s
  • income increases began to outpace price increases
  • cost of living is returning to its pre-pandemic level this year
  • energy transition spending was $303 billion last year, a record and two-thirds higher than before Biden
  • rise in real wages for lower-income workers lowers inequality
  • violent crime is down
  • $1.2 trillion infrastructure package to increase investment in the national network of bridges and roads, airports, public transport and national broadband internet, as well as waterways and energy systems
  • signed the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act that created enhanced background checks, closed the “boyfriend” loophole and provided funds for youth mental health
  • $369 billion investment in climate change, the largest in American history, through the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022
  • college debt relief to Americans with loans who make under $125,000 a year
  • cut child poverty in half through the American Rescue Plan
  • capped prescription drug prices at $2,000 per year for seniors on Medicare through the Inflation Reduction Act
  • imposed a 15% minimum corporate tax on some of the largest corporations in the country, ensuring that they pay their fair share, as part of the Inflation Reduction Act
  • rejoined the Paris Agreement
  • gave Medicare the power to negotiate prescription drug prices through the Inflation Reduction Act while also reducing government health spending
  • reduced healthcare premiums under the Affordable Care Act by $800 a year
  • signed the PACT Act to address service members’ exposure to burn pits and other toxins
  • reauthorized the Violence Against Women Act through 2027
  • halted all federal executions after the previous administration reinstated them after a 17-year freeze
  • signed the Respect for Marriage Act, requiring the U.S. federal government and all U.S. states and territories (though not tribes) to recognize the validity of same-sex and interracial civil marriages in the United States
yawn none od that matters if we destroy all life on earth with nuclear weapons. They’ve done nothing to address the existential theats
Bad faith argument right here. 🤡
Absolutely good faith. I care about existential threats. Dont greenwash away the real issues with a bullet point list of vomit to distract away from the real issues
  • all-time low for uninsured
  • unemployment has held below 4% for the longest stretch since the 1960s
  • income increases began to outpace price increases
  • cost of living is returning to its pre-pandemic level this year
  • rise in real wages for lower-income workers lowers inequality
  • violent crime is down

None of these are things they did directly

  • energy transition spending was $303 billion last year, a record and two-thirds higher than before Biden
  • $369 billion investment in climate change, the largest in American history, through the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022
  • rejoined the Paris Agreement

None of these directly help workers

  • signed the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act that created enhanced background checks, closed the “boyfriend” loophole and provided funds for youth mental health

If it’s bipartisan then the democrats didn’t do it.

  • college debt relief to Americans with loans who make under $125,000 a year

only a small amount

  • cut child poverty in half through the American Rescue Plan

only for a short period of time

  • capped prescription drug prices at $2,000 per year for seniors on Medicare through the Inflation Reduction Act

For a very specific group

  • imposed a 15% minimum corporate tax on some of the largest corporations in the country, ensuring that they pay their fair share, as part of the Inflation Reduction Act

Pretty sure this was because of a global treaty

  • reauthorized the Violence Against Women Act through 2027

Keeping things the same isn’t a improvement

  • halted all federal executions after the previous administration reinstated them after a 17-year freeze

Getting things back to how they were previously isn’t an improvement.

  • $1.2 trillion infrastructure package to increase investment in the national network of bridges and roads, airports, public transport and national broadband internet, as well as waterways and energy systems
  • gave Medicare the power to negotiate prescription drug prices through the Inflation Reduction Act while also reducing government health spending
  • reduced healthcare premiums under the Affordable Care Act by $800 a year
  • signed the PACT Act to address service members’ exposure to burn pits and other toxins
  • signed the Respect for Marriage Act, requiring the U.S. federal government and all U.S. states and territories (though not tribes) to recognize the validity of same-sex and interracial civil marriages in the United States

I don’t know enough about these to comment, on the surface they sound good but some are vague.

Well, he’s not a king or a wizard. It takes the whole government to get it done, and these were done under his administration.

I didn’t expect so many attempts to justify that only a violent option ever would do any good

USAmericans love violence. Look at their media, it's full of it. They'd rather see a gun advert or a story of some school children getting shot than a naked boob.

You are talking out of your ass 🤡

We do enjoy when a CEO gets adjusted tho;)

Nah it’s pretty spot on.
Conservatives are prudes but they love violence.

Start murdering the powerful capitalist oligarchs which will lead to zero improvements in healthcare and society

That implies a trend instead of a one off like this. A trend would absolutely ultimately lead to improvements. The oligarchy that rules us isn’t listening to polite letters and protests asking them to change.

But if they discover that their actions lead to great personal risk, they’ll quickly change their actions to avoid the risk. That means lower (fair) pay for the CEOs/stockholders. That means an end to the scamming they do through insurance. That means an end to price gouging in the grocery store.

The reason everything is shit (aside from the destruction of the middle class and housing crisis, which is itself caused by the oligarchy), is that the oligarchy is brazen and unafraid of risk in their wealth extraction.

That doesn’t rule out holding them accountable via a government that works for us. Having that (or working towards that) was too boring for Americans this time. But if we had that, I’m sure the rich would be at least as scared of government guns as you say they’d be of increased vigilante guns.

That doesn’t rule out holding them accountable via a government that works for us.

And how’s that working out?

Could be better. Could be worse. Still think it’s worth trying in addition to anything else we try.