Exciting update for those of you following our fediverse journey – starting today, you can follow people from other fediverse servers who have interacted with federated users or posts on Threads. You can see their posts by navigating to their profile, and you can also choose to be notified when they post on their server. More interop features are on the way, stay tuned 🙏🏼
@mosseri Sweet!! Can't wait to get this!!
@mosseri
Wonderful!
But does it also work here in Europe?
Thank you!
@Gargron Okay, now can Mastodon get proper DMs soon? Bluesky is really overshadowing Mastodon with a better DM UI.
@txnytvng Can we stop seeing this as a competition?

@DavidBHimself Eugen is treating this as competition, so there isn't any reason to not see this as competition. As previously mentioned elsewhere, he wants Mastodon to have mainstream appeal. For that to happen, Mastodon has to start adding features with mainstream appeal. DMs are the best place to start.

I would concede if Mastodon repivoted to a niche social platform instead.

Story 🤔🤔🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
Great, but when I check the two followers from Fediverse in my list, I click on their profiles and they seem empty—no data or info. what does it mean?
@digiwealth_newera  Could you tell us what server they're on? Do you see my info?
@digiwealth_newera It works for some accounts but not others, I can see some fediverse users' posts, but not mine
@mosseri Is there a plan to bring Fediverse sharing to the european region?
@mosseri I absolutely love this. Very exciting - I like how you're going down the punch list.
@mosseri NICE! Great to see it actually happening
Who are the top profiles the follow in the Fediverse?
@hi.nixson this is still developing because Threads is so new but I believe this will open the floodgates to Fediverse accounts that don’t want to manage a presence tied to Threads. I’m anticipating that government agencies and media will run their own instances that can be followed from apps like Threads, Mastodon, Flipboard, etc.
@hi.nixson Nobody knows. There is no algorithms on the fediverse that rates who is a top profiles. In fact, half of the fediverse is not even reachable by the other half. 
No way?? It actually happened? That's so cool, I was getting worried
@mosseri This is fantastic news. A decentralized social media universe (the Fediverse) will prevent what happened when a billionaire took over Twitter and forced us all to find a new home. Woohoo! I’m following myself from Threads. #Threadsception
@documentingmeta I know you were looking forward to this
@mosseri Great to see active work in federating Threads!
@[email protected] will Threads soon replicate X?

"Mark Zuckerberg has been very clear about his desire to be a supporter of and a participant in this change that we’re seeing all around America,” Stephen Miller, a top Trump deputy, told Fox."
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/dec/03/trump-administration-mark-zuckerberg
Mark Zuckerberg seeks ‘active role’ in Trump tech policy

Top Meta lieutenant says company ‘overdid it a bit’ on moderation after CEO’s dinner at Mar-a-Lago

The Guardian
Not sure what the fediverse is? Hope this helps! We’re working toward integrating Threads with the fediverse and adding new features over time.
@mosseri can you find and follow them without having an Instagram account / using Instagram ?
NOBODY WANTS THIS

FIX INSTAGRAM
I for one want this.
@mikeneedsaplan
But you enabled fediverse sharing! 🫶
What you are talking about? Your own account is optioned for Fediverse. Literally people should want this instead of flocking to Bluesky.
We want this! Instagram is a lost cause.
I know zero people with a Fediverse account. This platform can work if they just fix it
Bluesky is not part of fediverse afaik
@mosseri this might be big right now(to some) and even bigger later (to a good bit of the rest).
You guys are spending an outsized amount of time on these Fediverse features, which most people either don't understand or care about.
People don’t have to already understand or care about it for it to have value. It’s okay to create something new!

In the very early days of the World Wide Web, no one knew or cared what a website was. Until more and more browsers were made, a tipping point was reached, and now EVERYTHING is on the web!
Are you seriously comparing the fediverse to the literal birth of the internet as we know it?

Most Threads users don’t care about their content being shared on places like Mastodon. The engagement from those places is dismal.

How about improving search? Trending for all countries? Not deprioritizing news and politics? Improved moderation? This should be so far down the list.
Yes I am, because it’s a good analogy.

I remember being on America Online in the 90s. You could only access content within AOL. Some people had Prodigy, or Compuserve, and they were in their own separate world.

When the Web started, at first no one understood or cared about it. It was probly hard to explain to people what the point of it was.

But there WAS a point to it. There’s value in people being able to access each other’s content, regardless of the platform!
Sure, probably most users aren’t right now thinking about their content being shared to Mastodon, because it’s not the norm.

Just like how in the 90s, most AOL users weren’t thinking about sharing their content with Compuserve users or whatever. But that doesn’t mean there’s no value in it!
You sound like pro-NFTers from 3 years ago.

I understand the Fediverse. I just think it’s nothing worth getting excited about or spending considerable resources developing features around when Threads is so lacking in features that would improve our day-to-day experience here. I’m more concerned about the quality of my current Threads experience than the spread of my content onto other plate.

How about we reconvene here in 5 years to discuss how the Fediverse has revolutionized social media?
In what way am I like the NFT folks? Is it just that I’m excited about/defending a new technology? Or something in particular?

For the record, I was never excited about NFTs, I never saw the point in them, they always felt a bit scammy

And, I don’t see why the two things have to be enemies. Yes, day-to-day feature improvements are also very important. Why can’t a person be pro-that and also pro-fediverse?
In that you’re claiming something to be revolutionary (per your early days World Wide Web analogies) that doesn’t really have a clear significant upside for everyday users.

We’ve been waiting a long time for those day-to-day improvements and they should be getting prioritized.
No, it was an analogy. I wasn’t claiming it was as revolutionary as the web, just that it has value.

My point was that a thing doesn’t have to already be widely understood and wanted to have value. You can build something new that no one’s tried yet / understands, and sometimes it works. The web was an example of a time they tried something new & it worked.

Agree that Threads needs to get on some of those features, but again, I don’t see why these two goals need to be enemies
@mosseri Does this work?  
@stux @mosseri
Only following and likes work. No replies or custom emojis either 
@MisterMadge @stux @mosseri I believe some replies work from fediverse -> threads