Some shocking nonsense from France here. No one gets immunity from an ICC arrest warrant because they're in office - not Netanyahu, not Putin, no one.
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/france-says-it-cant-arrest-netanyahu-because-icc-immunity

See Article 27 of the Rome Statute: https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/2024-05/Rome-Statute-eng.pdf

France says it can’t arrest Netanyahu because of ICC immunity

French foreign ministry says it respects the decision of the court to issue arrest warrants but that the Israeli prime minister remains immune while in office

Middle East Eye

More background on this just yesterday from our legal experts:

https://hrw.org/news/2024/11/26/eu-cooperation-international-criminal-court-arrests

EU Cooperation in International Criminal Court Arrests

The document makes six recommendations to the EU and its member states to advance arrest strategies for outstanding ICC arrest warrants. These arrest strategies include complying with the clear legal obligation of EU member states to arrest individuals sought by the ICC if they are on their territory. But they also include using diplomatic, political and economic clout—in other words, political will—to bring about arrests in other countries.

Human Rights Watch
@andrewstroehlein Ah, the cheese-eating surrender monkey has spoken: "No, we're not going to do this because he might say something bad!"
@andrewstroehlein Interestingly, incumbent rulers were generally let off the hook until a court in #SouthAfrica ruled, while Omar el-Bashir was in the country, that he should be arrested (he departed before the ruling could be actioned).

@andrewstroehlein
Sure - once Netayahu is before the court. But to get him there, he can't be immune to arrest & surrender by a State Party under art 98(1). The Appeals Chamber already said immunities don't prevent arrest in the Al-Bashir case, but that was in the context of a Security Council referral, which Palestine is not. The Court could be called on to decide, & while some of its prior reasoning supports your position, not all of it does.

https://www.icc-cpi.int/court-record/icc-02/05-01/09-397-corr

@andrewstroehlein exactly, because in cases like the one in hand the crime was -specifically enabled- by the fact that the accused is a head of state. To suggest that there should be exemption would render the statutes around war crimes useless against the most likely people to be committing them.
@andrewstroehlein Problem I think is art 98 since neither Russia nor Israel have ratified the Statute and are thus not parties. @glynmoody

@andrewstroehlein

#Trump has managed to get immunity for everything, his entire life. #AboveTheLaw

@andrewstroehlein human civilization is a failure and always has been. It has always been every person for themselves
@andrewstroehlein I bet they’ll soon have cause to arrest Trump.