Why is taxing private jets considered to be "ideological" when we know private jets emit multiples more carbon dioxide per passenger than commercial flights and that their use is growing at an alarming rate.

The policy is based on hard evidence and should be in every party's policy if they are serious about tackling climate change.

https://phys.org/news/2024-11-private-jet-carbon-emissions-soar.html

#GE24 #ClimateEmergency

Private jet carbon emissions soar 46%: Study

The carbon footprint from private jet travel grew 46 percent between 2019 and 2023 and will keep rising unless the ultra-luxury industry is regulated, according to new research published Thursday.

Phys.org

@ccferrie not taxing the fuel on jets is ideological.

The air travel industry is subsidised from appetite to arsehole. Bunch of freeloaders profiting on subsidised planes burning subsidised fuel, paid to fly with regional subsidies to publicly funded airports attached to publicly paid for infrastructure.

I get that finally making them pay for their fuel like everyone else is difficult but progressive taxes on air travel are essential.