Imagine a society where those setting the regulations are wealthy in auch a way that they face no money related consequences. If they stuff up, or get into a tight spot with money, they’ll be a subsidy, or bailout, or sweet deal with a bank loan, or a wealthy relative, or they sell a property or a stock holding, or a mega yatch, or they’ll just declare that shell company bankrupt.

…this class of people - those with essentially no financial consequences in life, are expected to make empathetic and caring laws, systems, and regulations for the rest of us, for whom money is behind everything consequential. For whom a small or temporary lack of money drastically changes us and our quality of life immediately.

We have all the consequences they do not, they have all the power we do not. Nothing about this system makes sense, and it’s enough to say we live in a kind of Capitalist Monarchy, posing as a democracy of, by, and for the people.

Maybe vote against it?

Here’s a whole video about why that doesn’t work:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=rStL7niR7gs&list=PLrttDbiWQ…

Basically all governments are required to keep certain groups happy to even consider getting into power, and some of that involves… Certain kinds of payoffs and deals being made.

You can only vote for people wgo have already aquised to the system in order to get on the ballot.

You can vote for people who promise some slightly more progressive version of the status quo, but that’s as radical as the system is allowed to get by design.