@jeffjarvis Meanwhile, over at the AAAS, Marcia McNutt softly chides the scientific community to not advocate for policies. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adu4907

Correction, McNutt is NASEM President, not speaking for AAAS. Science editor Holden Thorpe had a slightly more pointed editorial after the election, saying scientists had to find better ways of protecting science from attacks. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adu4331

@jeffjarvis

As has been pointed out: how many Trumpists read the Scientific American?

@jeffjarvis JFC
every single person needs to listen to or read this book like yesterday

tbh know not of any solution, but understanding what is coming can potentially prepare to mitigate damages

Also telling people about this book, along w/a synopsis of the scary sh*t in it, will go a long way because education & foresight has always been the🗝️

Give GenZ this guys TikTok @ smokingandthinking6 account bc there’s zero reason to give in passively

f£€ing psychopaths🤬👿

@jeffjarvis @ehud

I am not sad to see her gone. Still subscribed to SM (perhaps because of nostalgia). But SM now is just a shadow of what the magazine was many years ago. And the way how they manage the digital subscription is just laughable!
—
I did decide to study physics after reading a paper in a 1963 issue.