I'm the oldest daughter of two Lt Colonels, and the product of a three-generational military family on both sides, and I think y'all need to listen to the next bit:

We ended the draft because the military's analysis of the Vietnam War revealed that 90% of all draftees would not shoot to kill, even when it was life or death. They'd shoot high or low, but they *couldn't* shoot to kill. As such, they actively degraded the war effort.

So you need to think twice before arming yourselves.

(1/?)

There's a lot of *wildly* irresponsible rhetoric floating around right now about how all queer folk should arm themselves to resist what's coming. And, deadass?

If you're armed, and you're not 10000% sure that you can shoot to kill, the only thing you're gonna do is get yourself and everyone around you dead.

Period.

A weapon is a *massive* escalation. Meanwhile, the tool that really gets you out of deadly trouble in a fascist dictatorship?

A silver tongue and steely guts.

(2/?)

Resistance is about far, far more than the image we have in our heads of the brave French resistance fighter in WWII. It's making the gears of their fascist machine grind. Drop a little sugar in the right gas tank. Lose important paperwork and records. Follow all the rules, *exactly,* in excruciating detail, explaining to the fascists that their superiors will come down on you if you don't.

(3/?)

Fascism is a machine. All machines have moving parts. You don't attack the reinforced bits. And fascism, specifically, is a machine built to kill. When you take up the same arms, you're attacking them where they're strongest.

So, when you plan your resistance, unless you're a very rare sort--probably with preexisting military experience--don't plan for a violence that you can't and won't win.

(4/?)

Governments are nowhere near as omniscient as you think, and have nowhere near enough resporces to follow up on what data they do have.

Wanna resist? One of the very best things you can do is look suspicious as fuck while doing *absolutely nothing* illegal.

Consume their resources. Frustrate the machine. *That* is how you save lives. Not weapons. Not for the overwhelming majority of you.

Leave that trouble for those truly prepared for it.

(5/5).

Tl;dr: Don't be the queer version of Meal Team Six. You're gonna be just as ineffective as they are.

@Impossible_PhD Also also? Not to put too fine a point on it, but arming one's self is a responsibility - to do so safely involves building and maintaining perishable skills. And the best time to have started that is not "now" it's "some years ago".

Weapons aren't magic talismans; they're tools with a specific purpose and like any other tool they're not that useful for someone who doesn't know what they're doing.

@Dani @Impossible_PhD Meh, pretty much everyone knows how to use a hammer and it's not a whole lot more complex than that. You have to maintain and secure it because it's more dangerous than a hammer. Mistakes are a bit more costly. It's not complicated though. You can go practice aiming and such to be better, but you don't need to be Rambo to rid the world of bigots trying to rid it of you. You better be willing though, and you might lose still and lose harder so...everyone's got choices

@crazyeddie

I get the frustration, the anger, pain, resignation and worry.
If you need to defend yourself or someone else, then please do.

But defense can take many forms.
To get reductionist with it, you can defend against someone with a weapon by injuring them so they can no longer use it.

Or you can disarm them.
Or you can reduce their will to fight through intimidation. (Including mockery, “defeating them with facts and logic”, reminding them of the cost of conflict, even just not backing down can be enough!)
Or you can make them see your humanity and theirs.
Start at the bottom and work your way up.

The point is to avoid worse consequences for both of you and anyone nearby.

@Dani @Impossible_PhD