Spread #privacy this Thursday!
What's your favorite chat app?
Here are our recommendations: https://tuta.com/blog/best-whatsapp-alternatives-privacy
Please comment with choice and reasons below!
Spread #privacy this Thursday!
What's your favorite chat app?
Here are our recommendations: https://tuta.com/blog/best-whatsapp-alternatives-privacy
Please comment with choice and reasons below!
@etherealfields @Tutanota They still require a phone number to use so no, it's not a viable option.
https://dessalines.github.io/essays/why_not_signal.html#what-makes-a-good-messaging-platform
"The less identifiers a database has, such as your real name, email, and phone number, the better. These are linkable attributes that only the sender and recipient should know, not the server or any intermediaries."
Signal. I don’t have a need for complete anonymity and the folks I need to communicate with securely are already using it.
I keep an eye on the Veilid project and may try to talk my colleagues into it in the future.
@Tutanota #XMPP is an egregious omission here. Mature IETF standard, federated, #FreeSoftware clients _and_ servers, end-to-end encryption...
You don't need a phone number or even an email ID to use XMPP, but you can also choose Quicksy for easier phone-number-based onboarding.
https://quicksy.im/
I've written a "Quick and Easy Guide to XMPP" here. https://contrapunctus.codeberg.page/the-quick-and-easy-guide-to-xmpp.html
@Tutanota I hate all of them. I use Telegram because it's what people use and at least it's better than Whatsapp. Me and my partner tried Signal but it lacks many features. I have no idea any of the others in the picture.
Choosing a chat app works only when no friends...
Chat apps should be forced at once to share the same protocol or whatever, so that people on Signal, for example, can talk to people on Telegram, for simple text at the very least. That would finally make people choose what they truly want to use, and not use because of their friends. We need EU to force that at once.