Democracy Matters 

Thirty-eight percent of voters see Vance as being “completely masculine,” compared with 27 percent for Walz.

LOL. Apparently, no one bothered to ask whether masculinity is a good thing or a bad thing.

#ToxicMasculinity #HarrisWalz #KamalaBringsUsJoy #NeverAgainTrump #VoteBlue #TrumpWillLose2024 #NoRepublicansEverAgain #USPol

Oct 19, 2024 at 7:44pmWeb
Show threadlolonurseOct 19, 2024
@DemocracyMattersALot
I wonder what mainstream, average people define as "masculine". I definitely do NOT see Vance as particularly masculine in any appealing or respectable way. And I think Tim Walz is comfortably masculine, without needing to display machismo or pee on a tree.
Show threadBrian DearOct 19, 2024

@DemocracyMattersALot

Statistics matter.

Just as much as Democracy.

When I see some post start off with “thirty-eight percent of voters…” I think, okay, show me the list with 92 million people out of some 244 million total eligible voters on it, a signature next to each name, proving they all actually said that about Vance. Otherwise, bullshit.

Show threadForeverExpatOct 19, 2024
@DemocracyMattersALot
This is one of those survey questions that is likely a dog whistle for those who have a distict (and perverted?) sense of masculinity. I cant imagine most people even knowing how to interpret "completely masculin" Was it a likert scale: Completely unmasculin, somewhat unmasculin, masculin, somewhat masculin, completely masculin? If so, the middle choice could be interpreted as normal. While completely masculin is over the top or trying too hard? In any case. Stoopid.
Show threadVariant488Oct 20, 2024
@DemocracyMattersALot Frankly who cares if he is or isn't masculine. Who even asks that kind of question? I'm more concerned about competence and integrity, neither of which Vance has.