“Some say 2+2=4. Others we’ve spoken to believe the answer is 5.”

– The media today, basically

@aral

I simply don't know you well enough to assess whether your position of 2+2=4 is valid.

I've had dinner with somebody opposing this claim, and while you and them would set different paths for math, I am optimistic that either 4 or 5 would be a positive step. I'm endorsing both.

@katzenberger Ah, the centrist billionaire position :)