to be clear, stallman has repeatedly shown that he's not a capable steward of software projects (everything that happened to hurd and gcc), and even less capable as a leader of an organization

even before you get into his toenail eating: he is very bad at his job

if free software is to mean more than a cult of personality, he should be replaced at the fsf, no question

i do not think he is capable or responsible enough to perform the job he gave himself

"what's his job" promoting free software and providing a real alternative to proprietary systems

"how's that working out" gcc kept getting forked to stop him sabotaging the project, eventually forcing clang to exist.

"oh" immediately after he stepped down, emacs replaced the default config with something useful over his crufty defaults

"i guess" other people have successfully written microkernels several times over, their secret was not reporting to rms. he is the reason hurd does not work

even before you open up the book labelled "the guy has really skeevy opinions and doesn't know how to keep his mouth shut"

or the large overflowing binder of "people who have left free software because of his behaviour"

there's a quick summary note that says "other free software organizations have broken ties with the fsf because of him"

for someone who kicked up a fuss over sudo it is kinda tragic they're clawing onto power over others despite the consequences

i muted this thread but if your response to "he is not good at the job he gave himself, and has isolated the fsf from the free software community at large" is a long unhinged post about how linus torvalds is the true evil for not using the AGPL, do me a favor and replace your carbon monoxide detector

i care about free software because i care about people, and putting someone in a position of trust who has repeatedly abused that trust, is anathema to the whole fucking point

@tef I liked some of his essays though. I wish he'd stuck to writing pretty essays... :/
@tef Maybe that's the lesson. Doing good is as much about what you don't do as it is what you do do. I suppose it sounds obvious, when I put it like that... :/
@tef sorry for boosting this but you’re just correct
@glyph i'm gonna mute it once i've finished, anyway
@glyph i am giggling to myself at "bad at the job he gave himself" but there's no other way to put it
@tef as I said! Simply correct!
Yeah he kind of fucked up gcc by not making a C library so that C code could compile C code, on the argument that it would let the corporations win. Not my favorite guy in the world. The GPL was a halfway decent idea, accounting for the fact that all software licenses are completely ludicrous political theater. He was also the first one I know who called out the threat of SaaSS long before anyone conceived of the word Degoogle. Definitely should have made that libgcc though...

eventually forcing clang to exist.

That's... a good thing?

@tef

@tef

What literally boils my blood is, LLVM team sent an e-mail to RMS stating that "We're ready to assign all copyright and stewardship of the project to GCC/FSF", and he allegedly didn't see the e-mail.

It's in GCC mailing list archives somewhere. I saw it with my eyes.

argh.

@tef Instead what do we get from RMS staying on & cultivating that cult of personality?

A crowd who shouts "How dare you fork GIMP!?" (to give an example) when the whole point is essentially the right to fork!

@tef fucking *what*.

Idk whi that is but please do not eat anything that comes off a human except breastmilk.

@MxVerda there's video of him eating toenails on stage
@tef has he had a psychological evaluation (yes, I know the criteria and interpretations are often crap) or is it a kink thing? A compulsion?
Do I want to know?
@MxVerda i am not here to diagnose i am just here to say that i do not think he's good at his job
@tef The FSF should be dissolved. It has outlived its purpose, with or without Stallman.