szakibOct 13, 2024
Somebody please explain it like I'm five:
WTF is the point of this rocket-booster-catching with chopsticks, if the tech already exists to simply land them on a flat surface?
#starship
Show threadMichaelOct 13, 2024
@szakib they aim for quick reusability withing 24 hours. So they don't want to use cranes, transport vehicles etc but just have the rocket already in place again when it lands.
Show threadChao-c'

@mika83ac @szakib yes, there are 2 or 3 main advantages:

- return to launch site. For boosters of large diameter and length, transporting empty stage using barges and cranes is complicated, while long distance road or railway transport may be completely impossible.

- weight of legs/struts: you don't have to accelerate and decelerate dead weight of landing legs.

- structural integrity of empty unpressurized cylinder: it may be actually easier to hang it, rather then reinforce it to stand on its base (?) (not sure about this). But even if the cylinder is rigid enough, it self-stabilizes itself when hanging, like pendulum (quite sure about this).

Oct 13, 2024 at 8:50pmWeb
Show threadszakibOct 14, 2024
@xChaos @mika83ac Thanks, this makes sense. I keep thinking about the cost of mishaps, though. If there is a RUD, the launch pad / tower is also lost and probably takes rather long to rebuild.