Am i the only one who feels like it's the same handful of users posting and commenting on lemmy?

https://lemmy.world/post/20740130

Am i the only one who feels like it's the same handful of users posting and commenting on lemmy? - Lemmy.World

At least on the communities i follow. Every so often I come across a thread where i recognize most of the users there even in the big communities with over 30k members and I haven’t even been on lemmy that long.

Because it is dawg.

Total users are like ballpark 1 million, and most don’t post much or at all – e.g the 1-9-90 rule.

By comparison Reddit and twitter are the most trafficed sites on the internet

‘Had to look up the 1-9-90 rule
1% rule - Wikipedia

Important concept when it comes to communities like Reddit and Lemmy, and something to keep in mind when talking about online marketing and propaganda.

A handful of posters, relatively speaking, essentially shape global consensus, and many know that, so plan accordingly.

Yes, plan accordingly as a reader, AND as a poster!
It’s a smaller neighborhood here dude.
I see that now
cozy. lets just think of It as cozy, why don’t we… ahhh, much better!
Hey watch your hand!
Yep! We smol.
Hey, it’s just the cold water.
“I was in the pool!”
Yeah, yeah… “i’m a grower not a shower”… “it’s not the size of the boat it’s the motion of the ocean”…
Be the change you want to see.
I’m not usually an internet commentor, but I try to chip in on Lemmy sometimes. I think most people just treat it like the rest of social media today, where the smart idea is to just lurk
I guess it makes sense that the majority of the userbase is just lurkers
Roll-call for the lurkers! (If u want, no pressure)
There’s definitely regulars I recognize, but still plenty more I don’t.

Yeah, there are a handful of extremely prolific posters who are awesome and keep the whole thing fresh. Then there are a couple dozen that I see at least a few times a week if not more. After that, I see a mix of familiar and unfamiliar faces.since I scroll All.

But even reddit had a similar pattern on a larger scale proportionate to the userbase. There were like a dozen prolific posters (or bots) whose threads got the most engagement even when they were reposts of someone else’searlier post.

I like to think of it like movies and tv, where a few prolific actors and actresses are everywhere and in things that get a lot of attention, but there are also a ton of people also participating but without as much attention because they are in fewer popular things.

If someone browses hot or new they will absolutely see the same few people the majority of the time since those are the most active people. Browse Active and there are a lot more that arrived a few hours after the post was made.

Part of it is also because you will notice the people you recognize, but scroll past the people that you don’t.

Having to check over usernames from the moderation side, I notice a lot more variety than I’d think about otherwise

in my case, there’s people i tend to always see the same comment-style and so their name sticks.

depending on the sub, that could be good or bad.

There’s dozens of us. Dozens.
I have no idea what you’re talking about, says the chump who has a series of precisely 103 formulaic knife reviews posted here.
Want to know about a really weird knife? Go check out what a tecpatl is.

tecpatl

Those Aztec weapons are awesome. We need more movies taking place in pre-Columbian times.

Small town vibes where you actually recognize people at the grocery store kinda thing.
This is one of the things I appreciate about the Fediverse. Even if we were to grow large, too, this small-town vibe can be maintained simply by using the instance federation tools. Reddit doesn’t really give you that same degree of convenience.
We don’t take kindly to those who don’t take kindly
Does anyone recognize me?! I need validation for my useless contributions. Valor and accolades!
I don’t see many users from the nsfw instance
Well it’s my porn account, and when my main user’s instance was seized by the Chinese or whatever, I thought I’d just stick with this. I have no shame now, it’s a little liberating.
Well congrats to you on your ummm… uhhh…
Mark Robinson, is that you?
No I haven’t seen it
Do you also happen to have MPD?

A place has to be seeded for a forest to grow...

Somebody has to do the job since normal person only reads, maybe upvote.

Agreed; and Lemmy communites require not only seeding, but tending by a dedicated poster. There are plenty of dead places where someone created the community, maybe made a post or two, then never posted again.
I do not have the time to post / comment usually.
After the reddit exodus I started creating memes for the first time and posting them on Lemmy. I’ve learned that it’s harder to be funny than I thought. Also a lot of time/effort and I have actually important things in my life that I focus on. Reposting was also kinda fun but what’s the point really
Yeah, it can be time consuming for sure
Yep, maybe it would benefit from more advertisement but I decided to not recommend it until I experience it for some time. It took me a week or two to realize that I don’t like moderation at lemmy-world for example, I would definitely recommend choosing other instances, and then, it takes time to figure out which ones are worth recommending. Some are extremist far-left/far-right, some are at risk of shutting down if admin gets bored and decides to stop paying for hosting from his personal money.

I recognize most of the users there even in the big communities with over 30k members

Communities with 30k members could really do with pruning the completely inactive ones. It's not like there's any commercial reasons to pretend that places are busier than they actually are.

absolutely. careful pruning and caretaking is how you nurture good communities. excellent comment.
I’ve stopped referring to community sizes - especially when there hasn’t been a post for a year. Instead, monthly active users is where it’s at:-).
I disagree. There is nothing to be gained by removing people from a group. You can’t predict when they might suddenly become active and by removing them you’re abrogating their ability to participate.

thoughtful. my issue here is while a community is nascent, isnt building maintaining an honest reflection of the community important?

I have joined a few tiny locally communities based on one post/comment. I may never return and the community traffic is irregular.

in a situation like that I can see a mod pruning me away for zero comments in a year. however that is a form of censorship. so its back to the default of mods run their communities as they wish and, if you disagree find/create another community or instance.

thanks for the thoughful comment.

It's a trade-off, I guess. Admittedly, there's not much benefit the user (though they could be warned via email if their account is going to be de-activated). There is however a benefit to the community, in that it can provide more reliable data to see if it's trending in popularity (a 100 extra users isn't significant if it thinks it has 30k users, but it moves the needle if that number is at a more realistic level).