Replying to @emilymbender's posts over on X: https://x.com/emilymbender/status/1844064007235436711

A reasonable alternative to a top-down policy, we believe, is to enable #criticalAIliteracies to develop from the bottom up. Allow faculty to make choices that comport w/ the learning objectives for their course. Educate students to empower them and enable good decision-making+

@[email protected] on Mastodon (@emilymbender) on X

Today, @UW sent out a survey asking community members to share our thoughts about the recommendations of the University's AI task force. It's a push-poll, that doesn't even define "AI", and the recommendations are appaling. In that light, reupping this: https://t.co/TgMSqnDNHL

X (formerly Twitter)
In addition to @emilymbender 's excellent post, we share the following resources, collaborative developed in conjunction with #DESIGNJUSTICELABS an NEH and Rutgers supported initiative for student- and community-centered research on & responses to "gen AI" (& "AI" more generally)+
Teaching Critical AI Literacies: living document

Teaching Critical AI Literacies: “Explainer” and Resources for the New Semester (Last updated September 30, 2024) This germ of this living document was prepared by Lauren M. E. Goodlad and Sharon Stoerger in collaboration with the Rutgers AI Round Table Advisory Council and the Office of Teach...

Google Docs

...and the entire first part of a 2-part special issue that is now free to all readers (please encourage your library to subscribe to #CriticalAI - including a transcribed interview w/ Emily & Ted Chiang and many others! +

https://read.dukeupress.edu/critical-ai/issue/2/1

We are currently organizing an online reading group for those interested in research and teaching on #criticalailiteracies.

Feel free to write us for more information [email protected]

We'd love to be in dialogue!
/end