Did you know it's illegal to knowingly broadcast false information about a catastrophe, especially if such communications may cause substantial “public harm?”
Public harm includes direct & actual damages to people or property & the diversion of law enforcement or public health & safety authorities from their duties.

Link to FCC rules on FALSE INFORMATION/BROADCAST HOAXES https://www.fcc.gov/reports-research/guides/hoaxes

But Elon Musk & X are not regulated by the FCC. So, HOW DO WE STOP THIS?

Hoaxes

The Commission's prohibition against the broadcast of hoaxes is set forth at Section 73.1217 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R. § 73.1217. This rule prohibits broadcast licensees or permittees from broadcasting false information concerning a crime or a catastrophe if: (1) the licensee knows this information is false; (2) it is foreseeable that broadcast of the information will cause substantial public harm; and (3) broadcast of the information does in fact directly cause substantial public harm. Any programming accompanied by a disclaimer will be presumed not to pose foreseeable harm if the disclaimer clearly characterizes the program as a fiction and is presented in a way that is reasonable under the circumstances. For purposes of this rule, "public harm'' must begin immediately, and cause direct and actual damage to property or to the health or safety of the general public, or diversion of law enforcement or other public health and safety authorities from their duties. The public harm will be deemed foreseeable if the licensee could expect with a significant degree of certainty that public harm would occur. A "crime'' is any act or omission that makes the offender subject to criminal punishment by law. A "catastrophe'' is a disaster or imminent disaster involving a violent or sudden event affecting the public. Complaints alleging violation of this rule should be sent to the Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Investigations & Hearings Division, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20554. Complaints should include the call sign and community of license of the station, the date and time of the broadcast(s) in question, and a detailed description of the public harm caused as a result of the broadcast. In addition, if possible, complaints should include a transcript or recording of the broadcast in question.

@spocko IANAL but if X is an internet company incorporated in the United States all laws are applicable to them. since there's at least evidence that the CEO is spreading that misinformation himself there's enough to at least log complaints to FCC FCE and FTC though usually they pay attention if it is organizations filing the complaint. flooding their websites with citizen complaints should be a viable tactic to get the ball rolling.

@blogdiva @spocko social media companies aren’t broadcasters though (according to the government). The law won’t apply to them.

I think this post is meant to encourage us to consider lobbying for a change in how internet companies are regulated. And I agree with that initiative.

many in USGOV been bought by Silicon Valley part and parcel to avoid regulations but there are many laws applicable to not just the corporations but individuals, esp CEOs.

Lena Khan has shown she wants to go after them. Biden didn't want her in the first place because he has made a career of being the capitalists' democrat.

lawyers need to step up and comb the books and start whatever legal proceedings needed to demand and force enforcement. a good start is the FEC

@dashrb @spocko

@blogdiva @spocko I’ve been impressed with Khan so far. She’s awesome!