If you’re making me side with Bambu in a court hearing you must be a pretty shit company.

Honestly IDGAF about Bambu, but these patents are for technologies clearly used by other manufacturers as well. Stratasys is just picking on Bambu because Bambu is successful, and they’re smelling a payout.

It is in the best interest of everyone in the hobby – not just manufacturers – that Stratasys loses.

Not a lawyer, but I think it should be pretty straightforward to prove that Stratasys is selectively /inequitably enforcing the patent given the prevalence of PEI build plates and automatic leveling, among other things, long before Bambu released a machine or became popular.

Ah but there’s the rub. The lack there of of proof and logic is exact reason Stratasys brought the suit to Eastern district court of Texas. This is the same court where patent trolls go to win their fair tale suits based on antiquated and overly broad patents that they purchased from long defunct companies. In the Eastern district court of Texas it’s not what you can prove it’s who do you know. Also known as corruption.