That thing where the state can’t maintain a minimal quality of life for its citizens but has no problem protecting insured business interests πŸ‘ŒπŸ»
https://m.ai6yr.org/@ai6yr/113227334944372546
AI6YR Ben (@[email protected])

Attached: 1 image ps. when they talk about "looting", this is what typically qualifies in disaster zones. People desperate, supplies in a wreck, but property rights > desperation.

AI6YR's Mastodon

If you haven’t already, I would recommend reading the book In Defense of Looting by Vicky Osterweil.

β€œLooting rejects the legitimacy of ownership rights and property, the moral injunction to work for a living, and the β€œjustice” of law and order. Looting reveals all these for what they are: not natural facts, but social constructs benefiting a few at the expense of the many, upheld by ideology, economy, and state violence.”

@Ashedryden I made this meme version of a Donald Rumsfeld quote for use in such situations.

@Ashedryden AI is looting intellectual content. Facebook is looting personal data. the problem is that some people loot and then exploit not just the stuff (land, tools, joy), but the people who need it, who discovered it, who made it.

The poor seldom consider what it would look like if the rich did the thing back to them, and how that would further entrench the imbalance of power.

@janisf @Ashedryden please listen to yourself. "Intellectual content" lmao don't you mean intellectual property? Working folks ain't got none of that. We earn with labour, not property. So watching the AI train to benefit the masses at the expense of the bourgeoisie is actually watching y'all get what you deserve. Hippity hoppity.

@LainTrain @Ashedryden I genuinely don't know what to do with responses that don't make sense because they don't refer to what I said.

I mean "content" and I mean what's generated by artists.

I'm not referencing classes at all, workers, bourgeoisie, or otherwise.

I'm not convinced anyone deserves anything, and neither one of us is the deity who's positioned to define that.

@janisf @Ashedryden idk, I only responded because it's your reply that made no sense to me, I think people deserve basic necessities when we have a society of such riches that can easily provide it but chooses not to, because the rich exploit labour, they earn with ownership of private, including so-called "intellectual property."

The internet is the commons and always has been, ctrl+C, ctrl+V, no one owns anything, that's why it's so liberating. To assert copyright and property culture over something as mundane as some images is beyond absurd. Twitter, mastodon, the whole e-celeb blog culture centered around figures rather than content produced by the people as a whole, anonymously for no purpose other than cultural contributions to their community is the real cancer of it all and I'm quite glad that AI is exposing this charade for what it is.