In the future, we won't need programmers, just people who can describe to a computer precisely what they want it to do.
@jasongorman This is a common reasoning, but an interesting question is: what if that's not true? What if we could vaguely describe what we need, see a result, vaguely describe some improvements, and get by with things that are temporarily sufficient for it current needs? It sounds unattractive, but unlike current software, it would always be close to what we need _now_, as opposed to going through an 18 month laborious process of requirements gathering a development.
@mathiasverraes @jasongorman “Next time, I want you to avoid smashing in his head.”