i don't think any amount of features or any liking of an interface can ever justify this
it's just not an argument, in my views
corporations should not own our social spaces or social lives, period
@lumi the thing is, alternatives cost money (if not the user, the owner) and people will opt to use the free one.
convenience wins.
you could make countless articles on the artrocities that happen on Discord and people would not care.
@lumi by the way, I'm not saying this in defense of Discord and the likes
it's just that it's not a fight we can win unless a good enough alternative comes up.
and even that at some point will need to get money somehow.
and money is where the bad stuff tends to happen.
@lumi the convenience argument still stands however
you can educate people that never used Discord quite well
People that used it however, you might be able to get some, but only a tiny fraction. They will stay because of the convenience.
Aside that, I don't think most people would really care about these arguments. They are problems, but nothing the common user concerns themselves about.
GDPR (and local alternatives) made more people aware of privacy nightmares...most don't care.
@lumi I don't see them that positively because I precisely didn't see the change with a lot of people.
I'm still somewhat bound to Twitter because of this, because convenience/addiction keeps people tied, even though better alternatives exist.
And that goes for pretty much any kind of service.
People know the reason that their current thing is bad, but they also have no compelling reasons to switch most of the times.
Mostly, people stay where their friends are, and for chat that's Discord