Shocking, powerful stuff from Chris Boardman and Active Travel England.

A study of over 100 cycle schemes has revealed that old-fashioned schemes (i.e. just painting the road) will 'kill 10% more people than doing nothing and you get no uptake because it doesn't make people feel safe', whereas a scheme designed to modern standards will get 'between 20-60% increase in uptake and halve the number of deaths.'

https://youtu.be/MPgi8_rHD9E?si=ZncCIn7nhqivhi4t&t=1621

#ActiveTravel #ChrisBoardman #ActiveTravelCafe

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

@BicycleBen That's great and as an occasional cyclist I support such schemes for many reasons.

However, mixing cyclists with pedestrians such as on canal towpaths is both dangerous and ruins such places for everyone else. So I'd love cyclists to have *their own* safe and efficient places, but not for schemes that merge them with pedestrians.

I walk on a towpath daily and am subject to disturbance and dangerous riding all the time, and this is not an urban or sub-urban route. #cycling

@markhughes Okay, I'm not sure what relevance this has to dangerous on-road painted cycle lanes, though on the whole I agree. But until good quality routes are established, canal towpaths will continue to provide a useful albeit limited part of the "network" - but they must be used and shared responsibly by everyone. I'm certainly not a fan of new shared use paths being created in urban environments and agree that separation is best.