.@CenDemTech’s @ericnull in IAPP explaining how important #DataMinimization requirements are for privacy legislation. https://iapp.org/news/a/a-view-from-dc-privacy-law-flirts-with-its-ban-it-era
A view from DC: Privacy law flirts with its 'ban it' era

Cobun Zweifel-Keegan explores banning provisions within Maryland's Online Data Privacy Act.

Eric Null: “[Data minimization requirements ensure] companies collect only data that is necessary to provide the product or service an individual requested….” https://iapp.org/news/a/a-view-from-dc-privacy-law-flirts-with-its-ban-it-era
A view from DC: Privacy law flirts with its 'ban it' era

Cobun Zweifel-Keegan explores banning provisions within Maryland's Online Data Privacy Act.

“The strictest definition would disallow collecting data beyond the absolutely critical. More appropriate definitions allow data collection for other specified, allowable purposes, including to authenticate users, to protect against spam, to perform system maintenance, or to comply with other legal obligations." https://iapp.org/news/a/a-view-from-dc-privacy-law-flirts-with-its-ban-it-era
A view from DC: Privacy law flirts with its 'ban it' era

Cobun Zweifel-Keegan explores banning provisions within Maryland's Online Data Privacy Act.

@CenDemTech Privacy as Secrecy is not a very robust framework to work with in a healthy society.

I recommend checking out Helen Nissenbaum's work on Contextual Integrity:

https://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=8862

And if you like what you read please consider sending someone to the upcoming CI symposium

https://privaci.info/symposium/2024/cfp.html

Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life - Helen Nissenbaum

Privacy is one of the most urgent issues associated with information technology and digital media. This book claims that what people really care about when they complain and protest that privacy has been violated is not the act of sharing information itself—most people understand that this is crucial to social life —but the inappropriate, improper sharing of information. Arguing that privacy concerns should not be limited solely to concern about control over personal information, Helen Nissenbaum counters that information ought to be distributed and protected according to norms governing distinct social contexts—whether it be workplace, health care, schools, or among family and friends. She warns that basic distinctions between public and private, informing many current privacy policies, in fact obscure more than they clarify. In truth, contemporary information systems should alarm us only when they function without regard for social norms and values, and thereby weaken the fabric of social life.