GlyphPlease do not add genAI images to punch up your writing. You might think that it adds a nice little bit of visual pizazz to your content-marketing piece, but what you're actually doing is *making it look like content marketing* rather than a useful resource. To the extent that content marketing is an effective tactic, it is because you build trust with the customer by providing them valuable information. A genAI turd plopped on top of your writing is a signal that it will be worthless slop.
⚯ Michel de Cryptadamus ⚯
@cryptadamist what can I say but “yuck”
@glyph forgot the best one from the prompt "satan endorses bitcoin". unfortunately the AI models can't make awesome stuff like this any more.
@cryptadamist I realize you are a crypto critic but maybe spending too much time thinking about crypto has given you some of their brain damage. (are you doing a bit? it seems like maybe you are doing a bit but it is going over my head)
@glyph crypto/fraud research has definitely given me some kind of psychic damage but i'm not sure what you mean by "doing a bit".
i legitimately think the "satan endorses bitcoin" AI art is some of AI's finest work, if that's what you're asking. it's incredibly alien and deeply disturbing, as such an image should be. unfortunately the AI models no longer generate those kind of images and are basically uninteresting at this point.
in my other life i'm an art collector, if that further confuses the issue.