Zack BatistAnnoyed by the efficiency argument for open science. First, it's not really a given that open science actually makes science more efficient. But more importantly, it panders to administrative impulses to de-humanize scientific labour, evaluate science through seemingly-but-not-actually-neutral blanket criteria, and instigate a culture of adversarial auditing in place of mutual cooperation
Eric R. Scott@zackbatist definitely agree with you on the point of de-humanizing scientific labor being bad, but on the other hand, no one *wants* to spend months trying to blindly recreate someone's analysis methods just to figure out if they can adapt it to their work.