Every reply person comes in 1 of exactly 2 flavors

1. "Oh, having a problem with Windows? Bet you wish you were using Linux now, huh bootlicker?" [Me: "How would you solve the problem in Linux then?"] [Them: "Oh I've never used Linux I just read about it on Wikipedia"]

2. Hey uhhhh I'm so sorry to assume there are things in the world you don't know but… have you tried [actual fucking cheat codes, deep secrets not documented anywhere] I'm sorry…I'm so sorry I'm going to go delete my account now

Note: If the anonymous Cohost ask I got above is you, I apologize if the above post has the appearance of making fun of you, that was not my intent

I try to follow a rule in life of being as limitlessly patient with people as I possibly can be until I break—UNLESS I have reason to believe the person I'm interacting with is fucking with me, in which case I drop patience levels directly to zero.

I do worry this leads to me seeming erratic because, at some point, due to me misreading a situation, or me getting 100 messages on a subject over 2 days, or possibly just head pain, maybe I *do* snap at someone who thought they were being reasonable

It's hard to say because there's a correlation where people who could accurately evaluate my behavior and advise thereon are probably too polite to do so, whereas people who want to manipulate me are very free with advice. For example, people I believe are fucking with me sometimes call my [game theory tit for tat] approach "passive aggressive". Maybe so! But I notice they only complained about it once I started bringing out "aggressive". I suspect all they really wanted was for me to be passive
@mcc like 80% of the data in my head about people I know online is heuristics about when and how well the comments/replies that pop into my head will be received if I actually post them.