Elon Musk’s Twitter Takeover Is Now the Worst Buyout for Banks Since the Financial Crisis

https://lemmy.world/post/18877132

Elon Musk’s Twitter Takeover Is Now the Worst Buyout for Banks Since the Financial Crisis - Lemmy.World

Nearly two years after Elon Musk’s acquisition, X’s business is still struggling to climb out of the deep hole it fell into under his ownership. The $13 billion that Elon Musk [https://www.wsj.com/topics/person/elon-musk] borrowed to buy Twitter has turned into the worst merger-finance deal for banks since the 2008-09 financial crisis. The seven banks involved in the deal, including Morgan Stanley [safari-reader://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/MS] and Bank of America [safari-reader://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/BAC], lent the money to the billionaire’s holding company to take the social-media platform, now named X, private in October 2022. Banks that provide loans for takeovers generally sell the debt quickly to other investors to get it off their balance sheets, making money on fees.

Guess the saying is true, if you owe the bank $1000, that’s your problem. If you owe the bank $13 billion, its the bank’s problem.
Hmm… How do I get them to lend me $13B??
The key is to have $60 billion.
  • Be rich
  • Don’t be poor
  • Align with the value of international finance, e.g. think that the poor exist to be exploited for greater inequality.
    They already covered that with 1. And 2.
  • Be rich and get richer
  • Don’t be poor and punish the poor for being poor
  • Shit, best I can do is be poor and punish other poors for being poor
    This makes me happy.

    Bank of America and Morgan Stanley commanded the top two spots in the U.S. leveraged-finance investment banking league tables in 2021 and 2022 during some quarters before Musk bought Twitter, according to data from Dealogic. In 2023 and 2024, JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs—which didn’t finance the Twitter deal—have held the top spots.

    He’s so toxic that being involved with him can unseat you from being the top two in your industry. This will make people a bit more hesitant to get into bed with him (gross) in the future.

    Barclays’s top investment bankers on the mergers and acquisitions team were told at a New York dinner early last year that compensation for everyone in the room would be cut by at least 40% from the prior year. The bank had several hung deals hurting its performance but X was by far the largest, according to people familiar with the situation.

    When you’re slashing compensation for your people, especially the ones who bring in real money, you know it’s serious. I’m happy to see X crash and burn and pull down bankers with it. Dumbass mf.

    At the time, Musk himself had complained that the price for Twitter was too high, but he decided to go ahead with the deal after waffling over it for a while.

    Mmmmmmmmm that’s not how I’d describe it, Marketwatch.

    I mean, he did have to decide if he wanted to pay the money and take the company, or just pay the money, as he’d signed a solid agreement. So there was a choice.
    “since the financial crisis” - You’ll have to be more specific than that 🥲
    Circa 1177 BCE. Sea Peoples ruin everything.
    Now now… I agree that the Peleset are all awful, but what have the Weshesh ever done to you?
    No single human should have this much control over our economy.
    Morgan Stanley has another problem right now too as Their CEO is missing in that yacht sinking
    Sicily yacht sinking: Morgan Stanley boss Jonathan Bloomer among missing

    Jonathan Bloomer is one of the six people missing after Monday's disaster, Sicily's Civil Protection says.

    We were due for our yearly billionaire offering to Poseidon.
    May the god of water take mercy on us with this wealthy sacrifice and place a harvest in our nets
    And hold back sea level rise!
    Either that or Jörmungandr has aquired a taste for richness. As a man who likes cheesecake I can respect it.
    My most requested recipe is: New York Style Cheesecake Stuffed, Chocolate covered, graham cracker rolled, strawberries.
    That sounds great minus the strawberries, add more chocolate instead.
    The strawberries make it a “healthy dessert.”
    Bite me I want more chocolate, also if it can give me cavities it prolly aint healthy.
    You probably don’t taste as good as the cheesecake and strawberries. I’ll bite them, thanks. Cheers m8 :)
    If I taste as I smell then I taste like motor oil, old metal, and oranges. Which is fucken bizarre and I dont know what thatd taste like.
    I am deep in prayers so that Poseidon, Oceanus and every other sea related deity take our offerings of other billionaires and their yachts
    Isn’t the difference here that Musk has a tremendous amount of assets in the form of Tesla stock that can be used to repay the debt? It’s not like he can declare bankruptcy and stiff them on the bill.
    The thing is, selling off the amount of Tesla stock that he’d need to to pay off the debt would cause Tesla stock to plummet, leaving him significantly less wealthy and putting Tesla in danger. So even though he technically has the money to pay them, he functionally doesn’t.
    Of course he can, it would just inconvenience him.
    Does he seem for even a split second like someone who can handle being temporarily inconvenienced?
    My understanding is the money he used to pay for Twitter was from loans by banks, where they got mostly Tesla stock as collateral. Musk can pay back the loan to get the stock back, or the banks can sell it. This is done because loans aren’t taxed, but selling the stock would be. Now the banks are stuck with stocks that are worth less than the loans they gave out, so they are at a loss.

    AFAIK that was the original plan, but wasn’t the final outcome.

    Elon doesn’t have anything tying up his stock on the purchase anymore. It’s one of the reasons for why he sold so much when he did the purchase.

    He may still have to sell stock to keep it alive, but it’s not collateral.

    edit: Here’s when the change happened

    theverge.com/…/elon-musk-tesla-twitter-margin-loa…

    After a brutal month for Tesla stock, Elon Musk will no longer fund his Twitter buyout by borrowing against his Tesla ownership stake.

    In a filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, Musk announced the expiration of a series of margin loans against Tesla stock, which had been included as part of his original financing plan to acquire Twitter. As part of the announcement, Musk committed to providing an additional $6.25 billion in equity financing, bringing his total commitment to $33.5 billion.

    Just to reiterate what I said above though, he still has loans, they just aren’t collateralized by Tesla. He could lose twitter if he doesn’t pay the loans, and the only way he can pay them is either twitter making money, selling or collateralizing tesla/spacex shares, or finding additional funding.

    Elon Musk will put up $6 billion to drop Tesla loans from his Twitter deal

    The Tesla CEO had initially financed his bid to take Twitter private with $12.5 billion in loans against his ownership stake in Tesla, the popular manufacturer of electric cars.

    The Verge

    If Musk doesn’t pay the loans the banks can take Twitter off him, but then they’re stuck with Twitter.

    It’s always lost money, but now Musk has driven off the advertisers and many of the high prestige users; got stuck in a bunch of pointless lawsuits he’s going to lose; and run up a lot of debt by refusing to pay people.

    And Musk knows this. The banks are fucked.

    Sounds like a they problem.
    They are too big to fail?