itgrrl 
and once again I’m reading RFCs on the weekend for fun^… 🙃
^ fun not included
^ fun not included
Kevin Bowen (has moved) 
Are you SHOULD reading or MUST reading the RFCs? 😉
#RFC2119 || GTFO 🤪 🤘
Eh. On occasion, RFCs work better than Chamomile tea. You MAY do you.
@kevinbowen lucky I don’t like camomile tea I guess… 🙃
Heh. So...valerian tea or rfc 3217? What's gonna send you off to dreamland? 😄
@kevinbowen previously that was an unintended (but not unwelcome) side-effect of some meds I was on, atm it’s fairly elusive even with otc meds. I’m working on it 💁♀️
I try to stay away from the deep magicks RFCs - whenever I’m at an org where I realise I’m the closest thing they have to a cryptographer^, I start to get twitchy… 🤪
^ I take the same approach to cryptography as I do to interpretation of legislation, even though I have had exposure to both: “I am not a [lawyer|cryptographer]. And even if I _were_ a [lawyer|cryptographer], I’m not _your_ [lawyer|cryptographer].” 💁♀️
Your footnote is _really_ good boilerplate for many situations.
itgrrl :donor: (@[email protected])
Attached: 1 image Pls repeat after me: “I am not a [lawyer|cryptographer]. And even if I _were_ a [lawyer|cryptographer], I’m not _your_ [lawyer|cryptographer].” 💁♀️
Whos awesome? Your awesome!