Don't. Ever. Publish. Stuff. That. ONLY. Supports. Dark. Mode.

I mean, I know a LOT of people love dark mode, and given the benefits that darkening interfaces provides... I get it.

But there are some people (like me) who may be visually impaired. Astigmatism, for example, can make reading text that is white on dark a real PITA. An effect known as "halation" occurs, where each letter behaves as if it were a flashlight, gaining its own halo of light and making all text read more blurry than normal.

No matter how good your glasses are, astigmatism still causes you to see a little blurry—it's something you get used to. But this damn effect makes all the text read as if you don't have your glasses on, or even worse, leading to much more tired eyes or even pain.

For everyone's sake, if you really care about accessibility, respect user preferences. If you want a dark interface by default, offer a light version if the user specifies it (in web design, this would be
prefers-color-scheme: light). The same goes for light interfaces.
@naipotato I am still mad that the standardizing bodies decided to remove "prefers-color-scheme: no-preference" and conflate it with prefering light theme

I have a strong preference for light theme yet there's no way to distinguish that from "I don't care"
@lunareclipse @naipotato related : I recently switched to libre wolf , and was quite annoyed it requires you to disable antifingerprinting to change the preferred color scheme to dark
@minekpo1 @lunareclipse the problem is that knowing whether you use a light or dark theme is one of the many techniques that exist to try to individualize you ​
@naipotato @minekpo1 companies should be banned from using accessibility features for that tbh