@fraying Just the opposite,

Those lazy people, who as the only political activity just vote once every 4 years should not claim anything to those who are doing polithics every single day.

This said, i'm in the lazy 'only vote' team who annoy my even lazier 'not even voting' environment, to vote.

I just realize that not all the not voters are the same , nor their motivations are just 'moral narcissism'

@fraying googled.

It seems to be a pretty usa centric concept with this full thing about saying vs doing, i was just applying the concept of narcissism to moral until now.

My full point is that Do > say and do every day > vote once every 4 years, so nothing against critizise those who doesn't vote as a pose (possing?) but all against about simplifying all the not voters in the same category

------

To avoid missunderstandings this is the definition that i'm managing from https://www.commentary.org/articles/roger-simon/moral-narcissism-least-great-generation/
-------

«That form is moral narcissism—a pathology that underlies the whole liberal left ethic today and some of the right as well. What exactly is this form of narcissism that is destroying—if it hasn’t already destroyed—our families, friendships, workplace atmosphere, and democratic republic?

The short form is this: What you believe, or claim to believe or say you believe—not what you do or how you act or what the results of your actions may be—defines you as a person and makes you “good.” It is how your life will be judged by others and by yourself. In 19th-century France, the gastronome Jean Brillat-Savarin told us that “you are what you eat.” In 21st-century America, almost all of us seem to have concluded that “you are what you say you are. You are what you proclaim your values to be, irrespective of their consequences.” That is moral narcissism.»