What Can a City Do When Neo-Nazis Start Marching Down Its Streets?

https://lemmy.world/post/18310079

What can a city do when neo-Nazis start marching down its streets? - Lemmy.World

The brazen appearance of white supremacist groups in Nashville left the city grappling with how to confront hateful speech without violating First Amendment protections. They first arrived at the beginning of July: dozens of masked white supremacists, shuffling out of U-Hauls [https://x.com/kate_ross_/status/1809760867812028846], to march through Nashville carrying upside-down American flags. A week later, members of a separate neo-Nazi group, waving giant black flags with red swastikas, paraded along the city’s famed strip of honky-tonks and celebrity-owned bars. The neo-Nazis poured into the historic Metro courthouse to disrupt a City Council meeting, harassed descendants of Holocaust survivors and yelled racist slurs at young Black children performing on a downtown street. The appearance of white nationalists on the streets of a major American city laid bare the growing brazenness of the two groups, the Patriot Front and the Goyim Defense League. Their provocations enraged and alarmed civic leaders and residents in Nashville, causing the city to grapple with how to confront the groups without violating free speech protections. Non-paywall link [https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/01/us/neo-nazis-nashville-free-speech.html?unlocked_article_code=1._00.91zO.b3mS-pBm2Sdk]

New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for New York Times:
> MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
> Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/01/us/neo-nazis-nashville-free-speech.html?unlocked_article_code=1._00.91zO.b3mS-pBm2Sdk

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

The New York Times - Breaking News, US News, World News and Videos

Live news, investigations, opinion, photos and video by the journalists of The New York Times from more than 150 countries around the world. Subscribe for coverage of U.S. and international news, politics, business, technology, science, health, arts, sports and more.

This is a good start: www.youtube.com/shorts/r_UP_EiXwKA

May I also suggest setting up rotten vegetable stands at the farmer’s markets?

Before you continue to YouTube

Point.

Laugh.

Call them “weird”.

Make them realize how unpopular they really are.

Briefly, then go all out ignoring them
Turn on the sprinklers.

The brazen appearance of white supremacist groups in Nashville left the city grappling with how to confront hateful speech without violating First Amendment protections.

The neo-Nazis poured into the historic Metro courthouse to disrupt a City Council meeting,

Arrest. Them. Holy shit, that’s something that in any reasonably sized city would be worth at least a night in jail to cool off, even if you were some fucking normie instead of a neonazi fuck. It’s not that fucking hard.

Arrest them for what exactly? Is disrupting a city council meeting anything but a civil infraction?

I don’t want this sort of thing going on, but what law would justify jail time?

I mean maybe they did do something to justify it, but I don’t know that disrupting a city council meeting should land people in jail. People also disrupt city council meetings when they try to pass anti-queer ordinances. And they should.

Arrest them for what exactly? Is disrupting a city council meeting anything but a civil infraction?

Criminal trespass, easy. Fuck, that’s levied all the time as a club against left-wing protesters. Yet when actual neonazis show up, they get nothing? Fuck that.

I think the answer to that is not ‘also arrest the Nazis,’ it’s ‘don’t arrest the left-wing protesters either.’

Balancing the scales doesn’t solve the problem.

Balancing the scales doesn’t solve the problem.

And neither does playing by the gentleman’s rules of boxing when your opponent is using brass knuckles. Fucking “They go low, we go high”? Did we not learn our lesson? If a weapon is used, the correct answer is to make the opposition see why that weapon was banned in the first place - it’s the same reason why many signatories of the Geneva Protocol allow for retaliation if chemical weapons are used against them.

So left-wing protesters should continue to be arrested as long as Nazis are also arrested? Really?

So left-wing protesters should continue to be arrested as long as Nazis are also arrested? Really?

… what? Not arresting Nazis isn’t going to magically un-arrest left-wing protesters.

It’s also not going to arrest Nazis that have already done these things. So how about we don’t arrest anyone for protesting and just make it legal from now on?
I’m sure police chiefs will get right on that
I’m sure police chiefs will get right on arresting Nazis too. What’s your point? We shouldn’t advocate for not arresting people for protesting?

It’s also not going to arrest Nazis that have already done these things.

You’re fucking kidding me, right? You don’t pre-arrest people. You arrest people after they’ve done shit.

So how about we don’t arrest anyone for protesting and just make it legal from now on?

God, why didn’t we think of that brilliant solution before? How many left-wing lawyers and political organizations have simply overlooked that we can just make it legal to protest?

I see, this is one of these “never try” situations. We could never stop left-wing protesters from being arrested so we should never try to stop it and advocate for that to end and instead just call for other people to be arrested too.

Because we shouldn’t want people to have rights, we should want other people’s rights taken away.

I see, this is one of these “never try” situations. We could never stop left-wing protesters from being arrested so we should never try to stop it and advocate for that to end and instead just call for other people to be arrested too.

No, it’s apparently one of those noble martyrdom things, where the correct response to getting brutalized by Nazis is to roll over and show how very moral you are by just passively taking it.

Because we shouldn’t want people to have rights, we should want other people’s rights taken away.

You do realize that this is already happening to left-wing protesters, right? The only thing you’re advocating for is that left-wing protesters get the full force of the state laid down on them while Nazis are allowed to roam free because “It wouldn’t be fair” to apply the same goddamn laws to them as long as those laws are on the books.

You’ve convinced me. Never try to get back rights that were taken away from you. Just get vengeance.
Vengeance is when you show why mutual disarmament is a good idea instead of showing that you won’t fight back, and the less you fight back, the less vengeful you are.
Got it. Fight back, but not for your rights which have been taken away from you.

You do realize a society can do more than one thing at a time, right?

Like, demanding police chiefs to arrest Nazis under the same circumstances that they arrest left-wing protesters is not going to magically diminish the work of left-wing lawyers and politicians to redefine the rules so that protesters, in general, are not being arrested. Even application is kind of the point of laws, and not simply allowing but actually advocating that an unequal application of the law be perpetuated (because it wouldn’t be fair if the Nazis got the same treatment as left-wing protesters) is, itself, incredibly damaging to the legitimacy of the government as a whole.

Fuck’s sake.

Like, demanding police chiefs to arrest Nazis under the same circumstances that they arrest left-wing protesters is not going to magically diminish the work of left-wing lawyers and politicians to redefine the rules so that protesters, in general, are not being arrested.

That… was literally what I was saying.

That… was literally what I was saying.

Read it again.

Like, demanding police chiefs to arrest Nazis under the same circumstances that they arrest left-wing protesters is not going to magically diminish the work of left-wing lawyers and politicians to redefine the rules so that protesters, in general, are not being arrested.

Okay, but it won’t happen, so what’s the point of demanding it rather than just working to redefine those roles and working to elect politicians who will do so?

It reminds me of some vegans who go out and protest meat eating. That’s not going to stop people eating meat. Working on campaigns to convince people why they should stop eating meat is what should be concentrated on.

I do not see what demanding they be arrested accomplishes when you and I both know they won’t be.

Okay, but it won’t happen so what’s the point of demanding it

This you?

I see, this is one of these “never try” situations. We could never stop left-wing protesters from being arrested so we should never try to stop it and advocate for that to end

And furthermore, it’s a lot easier to get cops to arrest people than to get cops to not arrest people.

I don’t know how I could have been any more clear that I was being sarcastic.
Left-wing protestors not getting arrested isn’t even on the table here, so I don’t see why the argument should be couched based on that.
Why isn’t it on the table? Shouldn’t it be on the table?
Because allowing these nazis to continue marching in the street will have zero impact on what happens to left-wing protestors, and denying these nazis the right to march on the streets will also have zero impact on what happens to left-wing protestors.
Okay, but you said left-wing protesters not getting arrested isn’t on the table. Why not? Why shouldn’t we do what we can to change that?
Yes, but I don’t see how that applies to this situation. The jack boots who arrest people for expressing their First Amendment rights aren’t going to stop just because some neo nazis were allowed to harass people on the streets via some left-wing action. They don’t care about fairness or our rights and many of them are probably sympathetic to extreme right-wing groups.

I can’t believe I have to keep explaining this… Cops do not do things if they are not paid. If you pass a law saying that cops will be fined for arresting protesters, they won’t arrest protesters. They may be right-wing, they may be thugs, but they don’t do things for free most of the time.

Is that really beyond the pale for a local municipality to pass such a law?

Left-wing protestors respect the social contract. NAZIs don’t, and therefore do not deserve to be protected by it.
People don’t deserve equal rights under the law? Are you sure that’s the position you want to take up? Because it sounds like a very Republican position.
Punching NAZIs is always self-defense, even if they haven’t punched you yet.

So you are saying that yes, the law should be applied unequally.

As I said, Republicans agree with that position. You and they are just at odds with who the same laws should help and who the same laws should oppress.

Free speech for me and not for thee has been one of their modus operandi for a long time now.

I’m not arguing with you about this semantic bullshit. To be a NAZI is to declare your intent to commit a crime. NAZIism is a criminal conspiracy.

There is no “equal protection” issue here, unless you think criminals deserve to be protected.

Please show that your claim has a legal basis in U.S. law.

Because I can show you the basis for a right to protest. It’s right in the Constitution.

Did I even once mention US law? Did I say anything about prosecuting the NAZIs? Did I say anything – anything at all – about the government doing anything about them?

No. I said it is right and good to fuck them up.

Now quit being a goddamn apologist and deliberately trying to misrepresent my arguments.

Okay, well this is about who has the legal right to protest, so your argument is not relevant to the discussion.
Arrest any and all groups that storm in and disrupt government functions, simple as that

Which means that people in the government can argue that virtually anything the government does is a “government function.” Mayor’s press conference? Government function. Better arrest those protesters. Governor’s mansion? It has public tours. That’s a government function. Better arrest those protestors.

Look what happened without that law when a president wanted a photo op with a Bible in front of a church. And you want to make that even easier?

You can protest outside the building perfectly fine, storming into the chambers and stopping the agenda is blatant disruption and I won’t argue it.
But how do you make it clear that is the government function that can’t be disrupted but the press conference afterward can because it does not count as a government function?
Don’t enter government grounds for your protests… do it outside the building.

Outside the building is often government grounds too. Those buildings can be in plazas which are entirely government-owned.

So, again, you’re saying you can’t protest the press conference (except from a great distance).

Balancing the scales doesn’t solve the problem.

Good point: the correct answer is, don’t treat them equally, because they don’t act equally. What we should be doing is exactly the opposite of what we are doing: fucking-up the NAZIs while leaving the left-wing protestors alone.

This is not hypocrisy, by the way. This is a simple application of consequences: those who do not respect the social contract do not deserve to be protected by it.

It may not be hypocrisy, but it is suggesting that the law continue to be applied unequally (just the opposite way around), which is definitely not a progressive position.

Criminal trespass…

Most city council meetings are legally open to the public. It is in fact their main purpose.

Most city council meetings are legally open to the public. It is in fact their main purpose.

I’m used to normal city council meetings being private, and public ones being the exception.

They’re open to the public unless certain members are asked to leave.

A public building can still kick someone out, and if they don’t leave, then that’s trespassing.

Civil disobedience can get you arrested, and while you might beat the rap, you can't beat the ride.
After seeing federal agents literally kidnapping people off the streets of Portland for “looking like protesters,” yes absolutely they can arrest them even if the charges are bullshit or won’t stick.
Not if they don’t get paid for it.

Both you and @[email protected] are arguing the same point. The only difference is @[email protected] wants nobody arrested and you want to also arrest the Nazis.

First of all ACAB let it be known. However I think it’s more likely to get a local city council to allow for anyone using intimidating imagery, (defined by swastika and similar iconography) to be detained and removed from chambers. It’s been done elsewhere with great effect.

The issue is how to get it enforced because unfortunately, those that burn crosses are the same that join forces.

smithsonianmag.com/…/long-painful-history-police-…

law.stackexchange.com/…/public-display-of-swastik…

pbs.org/…/germanys-laws-antisemitic-hate-speech-n…

@FlyingSquid - Lemmy.World

Nature is so bitchin’! [https://phys.org/news/2013-02-bird-plane-squid.html]

Jake and Elwood knew how to handle it.
If you punch a nazi, and you get two friends to punch a nazi and then they get two friends to punch nazis, before you know it, everyone is punching nazis.
My favorite shampoo commercial, even better
You can’t go around punching cops.