Crowd Cheers as Convicted Rapist is Eliminated in Olympic Beach Volleyball

https://lemmy.world/post/18293636

Crowd Cheers as Convicted Rapist is Eliminated in Olympic Beach Volleyball - Lemmy.World

Non-paywall: https://12ft.io/https://www.thedailybeast.com/crowd-cheers-as-convicted-rapist-is-eliminated-in-olympic-beach-volleyball?ref=home?ref=home [https://12ft.io/https://www.thedailybeast.com/crowd-cheers-as-convicted-rapist-is-eliminated-in-olympic-beach-volleyball?ref=home?ref=home]

I’m very conflicted about this whole thing. On the one hand, yeah it’s kind of a scandal and people have every right to be booing him every time he touches the ball.

On the other hand, he was convicted, sentenced, did time and is now back in society apparently showing remorse. People are calling for his career to end and various wishes of death on him. Why can’t he continue his life?

Are we supposed to lock up all criminals forever? Kill them? Just not allow them to follow their chosen career after getting out? Or is it just sports they shouldn’t be allowed to participate in?

He did barely a year of prison… I personally don’t quite think it’s enough for raping a kid, but hey that’s just my opinion
Enough for what? Your sense of vengeance? I don’t know, only you can tell… Enough for rehabilitation? I don’t know, but it is possible. Time needed for rehabilitation varies widely. It’s quite possible the year was enough. One thing we do know is that the Netherlands is heavily in favour of rehabilitation over punishment, since rehabilitation actually forwards society

This is exactly the point I’m trying to make, but am getting downvoted because I apparently sound like a “child rape apologist”.

I understand the crime is emotionally charged, but that doesn’t mean anyone convicted of it should just be thrown in the oubliette.

I would like to propose “forgettamatorium” as an English translation for oubliette.

that doesn’t mean anyone convicted of it should just be thrown in the oubliette.

Yes it does. I think having empathy is a good thing and most people deserve it. Not child rapists.

So you’re for punitive justice instead of rehabilitive justice?
For pedophiles, yes!

child rapists or pedophiles? One is a crime another is a psychiatric disorder.

Less than half of child rapists are pedophiles.

No im pretty sure all child rapists are pedophiles. I do not think the 2 ideas should be separated. You make it sound like you are cool with people being pedophiles as long as they’re not a child rapist. Fucking weird.

Most child rapists are not pathologically attracted to children.

You can think what you’d like but pedophelia has official DSM-5 Diagnostic criteria and there’s an entire academic body of literature behind this.

No, i just dont care about anything you’re talking about. All it comes off to me as you are trying to say being a pedophile is not that bad.

Claim whatever by whomever. Nothing now can change the fact that you are pro pedophile and thats just weird.

I’m not pro-pedophile? I’m someone who took a college class on the matter. I’m very far from an expert, but I can tell you know much less.

Fuck anyone who harms children. But being attracted to children is not a choice, science has proven that. And acting like these people are all evil (even if they’ve never acted on their urges) makes then less likely to seek help because of shame, and increases the rate of children who are hurt.

Wow im being down voted for being a anti-pedo. Yall are fucking weird. And sick 🤮.
No you’re being downvoted for being in favor of barbaric punishments instead of rehabilitation.
Having a less cruel mindset is what allows it to go on though. Our justice system is built by predators for predators so victims are already at a disadvantage, and the fact that anyone would want consideration for the rapist only encourages others. The whole idea of being at all lenient on child rapists is crazy to me.
Why do you think anything less than brutal death is “lenient”
My sister was raped as a kid, and as long as i have known pedophiles/child rapist are the worst of the worst. There is no rehabilitation for that. There should be no opps i didnt mean to go to another country and get a 12 year old drunk and rape her 3 times, then appear to the world as the best people can provide. Its just sickienng to try and normalize or be at all lenient toward such vile acts.
The problem is that people absolutely believe that.

I believe people can change and I think it’s important we hold space for people to do so. However, that hinges on the person actually growing, which often starts with showing remorse. I know you implied that this guy has done so, but I haven’t seen any evidence of that.

Even the quote you posted somewhere else about it being the worst thing he’d done, or something like that? That very much sounds like a, “I’m not sorry I did it, I’m sorry I got caught” kind of statement.

Asked if van de Velde had ever expressed any remorse to him for rape, Immers [his teammate] said: “No, he doesn’t, he doesn’t explain it.” (source)

“I have been branded as a sex monster, as a pedophile,” he said. "That I am not — really not.” (source)

If there’s an apology or some actual statement showing his remorse, I’d love to see it, but I’m skeptical that it exists. This whole controversy he’s had a huge opportunity to step up, apologize, and rebuke his prior actions. Instead, he’s faced it all with silence and a reaction of ‘I don’t want to talk about it.’ That is not the behavior of a person who acknowledges they were in the wrong, imo.

Volleyball partner of child rapist Steven van de Velde breaks silence after he was booed

The convicted rapist is not staying at the Olympic Village with his fellow competitors.The volleyball partner of convicted child rapist...

JOE.co.uk

Seems like this whole debacle is because he didn’t make a press tour saying to the whole wide world how remorseful he is, but the comittee said that experts determined that he was remorseful though, so we shouldn’t trust the experts now?

Van de Velde has fully engaged with all requirements and has met all the stringent risk assessment thresholds, checks and due diligence. Experts have stated that there is no risk of recidivism.

Van de Velde has consistently remained transparent about the case which he refers to as the most significant misstep of his life. He deeply regrets the consequences of his actions for those involved. He has been open about the personal transformation he has undergone as a result. Since his return he has participated in major international events without incident.

from nocnsf.nl/…/nocstarnsf-takes-measures-to-ensure-a…

NOC*NSF takes measures to ensure a safe sporting environment for all Olympic participants - NOCNSF

This site is full of left wing fakers who blow their cover when it comes to stuff like this.
I think a lot of users are just very young, and the light of idealism hasn’t left their eyes.
Your pretentious pseudo-enlightened bullshit pisses me of. No, not everyone here is out for vengeance. But there’s a middle ground between capital punishment and letting a child rapist go after only 13 months without them expressing remorse plus letting them represent their country at the Olympics. Travelling to another country to convince a 12 year old to have unprotected sex three times in two days, leading them to self-harm including and overdose is not “fornication”, it’s rape. This is not rehabilitation but a blatant failure of the Dutch justice system and society.
Plenty are though, just scroll up.
True, Breezy is just one example. But that’s not the ones they were discussing with.
I am European and heavily against punitive justice. But I think one year of prison for a crime almost universally considered among the worst is not enough for rehabilitation, and I find this opinion validated by the lack of understanding or even remorse shown by the guy in public statements

I agree, it seems like a small amount on the face of it.

But at the same time, I’m more inclined to trust the judgement of the prison system (at least in The Netherlands) as to whether he is ready to return to society.

Those that defend rapists are probably rapists.
Nice slogan, but back in reality, there’s a phenomenon documented in psychology literature called Projection. It’s usually those who rabidly accuse others and calling for harsh punishments that are guilty of those same behaviours they are condemning.
Are you joking? Dude. This is pathetic.

It is possible and encouraged to try and have empathy for even the worst of people.

Am I an islamic terrorist because I think the CIA shouldn’t torture the 9/11 planners for two decades?

Torture isn’t imprisonment though. One of them is an established method of punishment for actual criminals and the other one is just pointless.

Also the US has the death penalty so you know I suppose it’s proportionate by their standards.

It’s not the prison system of the Netherlands that you should be considering, It’s the legitimacy of the politicians that decided to release him. Clearly it was a political move do you believe that somebody else in his position would have been released so early?

While I agree this seems extremely small. The netherlands is not the US. The specifics of court cases are not made public. We have no idea about them. It might be a very ambiguous case that barely fit the definition of rape or whatever.

Not trying to defend rape or rapists, but we may need more context before we can judge the length of a sentence.

It seems like a lot of criminals who “did their time” really didn’t do much at all.

Compare that to a lifetime of hurt caused to the victim(s) and their families, and it just doesn’t seem good enough.

On the other hand, he was convicted, sentenced, did time and is now back in society apparently showing remorse.

Nope, neither of those.

What do you mean? He served 13 months and got out on parole. He’s publicly expressed remorse, but that isn’t exactly conclusive. I assume there would have been some genuine remorse inside, otherwise there would be no parole.

My point is, if you stop anyone who has been to jail returning to normal society at all, then why let them out at all? You might as well just put every criminal in jail for life, or just kill them straight away.

He didn’t just return to society though. He returned to a place with more prestige, than most people of the same society will ever experience in their lives.

While I agree with the sentiment, that criminals need a way back into society, that doesn’t mean they should have a right to return to their old lives. Especially if those lives includes representing there nation at international events.

He should have to deal with the consequences of his actions and that should include that certain actions exclude you from certain positions in a society, no matter if you served jail time or not.

Did you consider that the Netherlands thinks its important to stand by its rule of reform over punishment? You are being incredibly vague as well with what the person deserves.

Say it plainly, what should have been done instead?

You might as well just put every criminal in jail for life, or just kill them straight away.

Just the child rapists is fine with me. There’s no reforming that.

“I can’t reverse it, so I have to carry the consequences. It’s the biggest mistake of my life.”

Source: The article linked in the OP

If that’s not remorse, I don’t know what is.

Never apologiest, and he only ever talks about how it was bad for him. Remorse it is not.

Remorse: “I am sorry for what I did and the impact it had on the victim. I made stupid choices that hurt another person, and while I can never take that back, I will seek to do better so no one needs to suffer from my actions again.”

Not sorry you did it, just sorry you got caught: “I can’t reverse it, so I have to carry the consequences. It’s the biggest mistake of my life.”

he can continue his life, but get the fuck out of public positions like this if youre a fucking pedo rapist

apparently showing remorse

He showed no remorse. He called it nonsense. He said he made mistakes as a youth. He has not even bothered to offer anything in the way of an apology.

I also saw those statements on his wiki. Also saw some about it being “the worst mistake of his life”. I don’t imagine he would get parole without showing remorse.
You don’t imagine? Well then that proves it. He’s very sorry he raped a 12-year-old girl over and over even though he’s never said so in public.
With this kind of conservative mindset, how can you ever believe the US of A will become anywhere close to progressive? Or aren’t you voting Trump next election?

The “conservative mindset” that someone who raped a 12-year-old over and over should, at the very least, make a public apology before being allowed to join their Olympic team?

You’re right, that’s a total MAGA position. Trump 2024!

Well the way you’re speaking fits that MAGA profile perfectly. How can you believe in a progressive future if you keep spouting conservative beliefs? Everything you have said, in this thread, is the typical MAGA barf. Because it sounds like you don’t believe in governments.

Absolutely. We all know what big fans of public apologies MAGA people are.

And, of course, suggesting someone who raped a 12-year-old girl multiple times should make a public apology before being allowed on an Olympic volleyball team definitely means I don’t believe in governments.

It’s amazing how you’ve gotten me totally right so far.

Well it’s no surprise how you are mistaking how right (wing) you truly are.

I have the impression you like repeating those exact words too, like a sicko.

Again, you totally have me pegged. There is nothing more right wing than expecting a child rapist to apologize for repeatedly raping a child before being allowed on an Olympic team. That’s basically Hitler-level evil.

And that’s why I will definitely be voting for unrepentant rapist and known friend of Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump.

And also why I definitely hate government.

Trump 2024! Anarchy forever!

It sounds like you’re obsessed with the words “child rapist”. It’s disgusting. Repeating the same stuff just so you have the last word, like a tru MAGAT. Good luck with your conservative ideas, I guess. There ain’t a gram of good faith here.
Am I obsessed with the words ‘child rapist’ or is the subject of this discussion someone who raped a child? Because I may be a stupid anarchist right-wing Trump supporter, but I’m pretty sure it’s the latter.
Well since you’re a trump supporter its very obvious you would be pro child rape. Its just another weird conservative thing, I don’t agree with it in fact i believe all child rapist should be shot.

There ain’t a gram of good faith here.

Agreed. Now, stop defending the CONVICTED CHILD RAPIST, you creepy fucking weirdo.

Dude, you’re the one not arguing in good faith. Take a step back.
No, the conservative mindset would be that she was married and wives can’t be raped.