Who are we all descended from? And I mean π‘Žπ‘™π‘™ - people, birds, plants, bacteria, archaea....

It's called π—Ÿπ—¨π—–π—”: the last universal common ancestor. And people have been trying to track it down. By comparing the genomes of different organisms you can infer a tree of life and guess where it leads back to.

This new paper suggests that LUCA lived about 4.2 billion years ago, with a genome having about 2.5 million base pairs.

They guess it was a prokaryote: a single-celled organism with no nucleus. They guess it was anaerobic. Neither of those are at all surprising. More interestingly, they guess it was an acetogen! I hope you know acetic acid is what makes vinegar sour. Nowadays, 'acetogens' are bacteria that power themselves by converting carbon dioxide and hydrogen to acetic acid and water:

2 COβ‚‚ + 4 Hβ‚‚ β†’ CH₃COOH + 2 Hβ‚‚O

This produces less energy than fermentation, which converts glucose to acetic acid. But hey: sometimes there ain't no glucose around.

The paper says that the metabolism of LUCA could have provided a niche for other microbes living at the time, and recycled hydrogen they made. It's the blue box in the web of chemical reactions carried out by early organisms in the picture at left.

At right you see how if bacteria called methanogens were also also around, they could put methane (CHβ‚„) into the atmosphere, which gets broken down to Hβ‚‚ by sunlight. When this dissolved in water, acetogens can eat it!

The paper is open access:

β€’ The nature of the last universal common ancestor and its impact on the early Earth system, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-024-02461-1

The nature of the last universal common ancestor and its impact on the early Earth system - Nature Ecology & Evolution

Integration of phylogenetics, comparative genomics and palaeobiological approaches suggests that the last universal common ancestor lived about 4.2 billion years ago and was a complex prokaryote-grade anaerobic acetogen that was part of an ecosystem.

Nature
@johncarlosbaez Does this explain why we like vinegar on chips?
@ThePsyOfLife @johncarlosbaez anybody who likes vinegar on chips? πŸ˜‰

@Henrysbridge @johncarlosbaez

That's a thing? There are people, like a lot, who like vinegar on chips. Doesn't that make them soggy? I like my chips crisp.

@ThePsyOfLife @johncarlosbaez Sometimes, chips which are a bit mushy are great with fish and chips.
I'll chuck in some mushy peas as well if you like...

@Henrysbridge @johncarlosbaez

I guess I can't continue pretending I don't know the different meanings of chips for much longer, but it's been fun while it lasted. Thanks for playing along.

@ThePsyOfLife @Henrysbridge @johncarlosbaez
That preference might be related to baked beans on toast?

@0lschok @Henrysbridge @johncarlosbaez

Because the sulfurous nature of beans produces vinegary farts?

@ThePsyOfLife @Henrysbridge @johncarlosbaez

Adding vinegar to beans (and lentils) for better taste and digestibility is quite widespread. But pouring baked beans on slices of toast seem to be typical for the island people living at Europe's culinary fringe.

@0lschok @ThePsyOfLife @johncarlosbaez

Oh, that's only the half of it...

(to be fair, there's plenty of good stuff too - fish and chips is absolutely fine. Just don't ask what goes into sausages... It's unfortunate that in the 20th C we had a few generations who believed in boiling everything to b*gg*ry and beyond!)

And now a terrible confession - I'm quite partial to beans on toast - with a dash of tabasco!

@Henrysbridge @0lschok @johncarlosbaez

Tobasco, Louisiana's contribution to international cuisine.

Nothing wrong with beans and toast. Po'folk been eating beans and toast for generations.

Ketchup, States contribution to international fine eating.
Fish and Chips, UK's contribution, right?

@ThePsyOfLife @Henrysbridge @0lschok - tabasco plus tobacco equals tobasco.

@johncarlosbaez @Henrysbridge @0lschok

Hmmm... I never thought of it like that before, but when you point it out, it kinda makes sense. By Jove, I think you're onto something!

@ThePsyOfLife @Henrysbridge @johncarlosbaez
Yes, Fish and Chips are great (and the British, Dutch and Belgians know how to keep chips at a reasonable size).
Nothing against beans if one wants good performance:
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/what-did-gladiators-eat

But soaking toast with it ... I ate it once (as part of a cultural education trip) but it definitely runs against my upbringing with real bread, which rarely exists west of the Rhine.

Gladiator Diets Were Carb-Heavy, Fattening, and Mostly Vegetarian

To survive the arena, they ate a mash of barley and beans.

Atlas Obscura

@0lschok @Henrysbridge @johncarlosbaez
Don't get me started about bread and processed foods. I was looking at pictures of the '68 DNC, everyone is slim. No obesity.

It's funny how the big American food corporations are basically killing us slowly to milk us for profit. And, how we've convinced ourselves that we need meat in our diet when it provides so little real nutrition.

@Henrysbridge @ThePsyOfLife @johncarlosbaez
Yes, the ingredients are not the problem,
and with a little modification
- replace white beans with lentils
- remove tomato sauce
- add oil and spices
- replace toast with grey bread
this could be tasty.