return2ozmaTrump Agrees to a Fox News Debate with Harris on Sept. 4
Media Bias Fact CheckerNew York Times Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [**High**] (Click to view Full Report)
> Name: New York Times
> Bias: Left-Center
> Factual Reporting: High
> Country: United States of America
> Full Report: mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/
Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News
Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.
Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.đ
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.
New York Times - Bias and Credibility
LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appeals to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources. Overall, we rate the New York
According to Mr. Trumpâs post on his social media site, the debate is to take place at a to-be-determined location in Pennsylvania, the must-win battleground state that could help decide the election. Fox News anchors Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum would moderate.
It was unclear early Saturday if Ms. Harris had agreed to the debate and its terms. Representatives for her campaign did not respond to requests for comment. A spokeswoman for Fox News also did not respond to questions.
I think itâs worth waiting to see if Harris has actually agreed to this, in the extremely unlikely chance that Trump lied about a thing.
Also, pretty funny that even with Trump possibly lying to get his dream scenario, he still needs a month to prepare and it has to be in his safe space network.
he is only âagreeingâ with the voice inside his head bouncing between the three brain cells. trying to play games and force harris into it.
i highly doubt harris would agree to those terms. nfw.
Iâm sorry but youâre wrong. Two brain cells fighting for third place.
Would be funny to have it at the same place he got shot at last time.
Have it at the 4 Seasons (Total Landscaping parking lot).
Thatâs even better, nice one.
I truly canât believe this timeline. That moment canât have been real. Yet it was.
jballsI would love if both Fox News and the Harris campaign came back and were like âwtf no one ever told us about this. Old dude with dementia is just making shit up again.â
ganksyThe Harris campaign on Saturday declined to commit to the Fox News debate and said it was still planning on a Sept. 10 debate hosted by ABC.
âDonald Trump is running scared and trying to back out of the debate he already agreed to and running straight to Fox News to bail him out. He needs to stop playing games and show up to the debate he already committed to on Sept. 10,â
I think thatâs pretty clear.
Pleassssseeeee stick to this Harris!! Man we can only hope.
Iâm glad she called it exactly for what it was. Too bad Magoos will only see this as she wants her supposed safe space. :(
Well, Harris does have a pre-existing commitment coming up soon. Surprised Trump didnât challenge her to debate during that.
Heâll do a debate if itâs in his safe space. Snowflake.
Hopefully itâs outside.
Underhanded. I like it.
I think this is bad news tbh. Harris can be as capable as she wants, but if the broadcaster doesnt stop Trump from a endless ramble or cut off his mic if he escalates to intolerable levels of behaviour, then this could end badly.
Donât give Fox News respect. Start talking shit about it right now. Call this what it is, a scared old weird man who will only debate Harris on a ânewsâ network currently paying billions for lying to everyone about the last election. Harris will treat Trump and the âjournalistsâ playing moderators like children which is how we shouldâve been treating them for years. Talking to them like adults validates their lies and bullshit.
Harris should call them out. âI said a debate on a news source, not some weird entertainment channel. Might as well have the weather channel moderate the debate!â
While entertaining for us, I donât think thatâd be a wise reaction. If she wants to win, she probably also needs to sway some people that are lifetime FOX junkies. Such a reaction could have a âbasket of deplorablesâ effect (being the stone cold truth, but hardly effective)
Being nice to idiots has proven to be hardly effective. Kamala needs to read word for word the arguments the Fox News lawyers made when they were in court for the dominion case. Fox News isnât news itâs entertainment and they donât employ journalists they employ entertainers. This is what Fox News said. People being unwilling to call out bullshit is how we got here.
No, what she needs to do is win this election. Thatâs her job, everything else (like taking entertainment corpos to task for their shady tactics) comes secondary right now.
I fail to see how one impedes the other, in fact I would argue it would help her win. If sheâs running on doing just that why wouldnât she take a shot. Why hide? You think any Fox News fanboys would be swayed by anything Kamala says? Her time would be better spent attracting unregistered voters and she could do that by saying the quiet part out loud.
I fail to see how one impedes the other, in fact I would argue it would help her win
Okay, give me an argument why setting Fox straight will help her win the election, because just saying so isnât an argument. Iâd argue that time spent bickering âwith Fox about Foxâ isnât time spent getting people that wouldnât otherwise vote for her, to vote for her. (and that, by the way, is how one impedes the other)
Why hide?
Nobody said she should hide.
You think any Fox News fanboys would be swayed by anything Kamala says?
And this is the main point: Yes actually. If she makes salient points about matters that are dear to them, something is going to gnaw eventually. Have you seen Bernie Sandersâ appearances on the network? The audience definitely seems to be on his hand some of the time, just because he points out that what they have been told on the network isnât making sense. It can be done. A bunch of them are a lost cause for sure, but certainly she ought to be able to get some of them to vote for her, she running against Trump (for fox sake!).
Her time would be better spent attracting unregistered voters
Agreed 100%, those also watch Fox though. And Trump spouting his garbage freely on that channel without opposing voices will not make them vote for Harris.
You really think itâs not ridiculous to point out how ridiculous it all is? There is value in calling out the elephant in the room however thereâs no value in validating Fox News and giving into the grift. That only benefits Fox News and Trump.
Pretty sure Fox is run by a scared old weird man.
Fucking hell Iâm actually excited. If you had asked me literally a month ago I wouldnât have given a shit and would have laughed if you had told me Iâd be interested. Donât get me wrong I was going to vote either way, but man I cannot wait for Harris to slam the shit out of this dirt bag and make a national embarrassment of him. The shit that worked with Biden sure as hell isnât going to fly with Harris.
Donât underestimate the ratfuckery Fox Entertainment Channel can get up to.
nepenthesI cannot stand his voice; I always end up muting the TV and reading the closed captioning. Those poor people that have to do the live captioning thoughâŚ
Flying SquidI canât either. On the other hand, Iâll take it because heâs going up against a very seasoned prosecuting attorney.
When Trump was in office foreign translators got a ton of shit for doing thier job. So many non English speaking people thought the translators were drunk. That made more sense at the time than The President of the United States of America actually saying the things he said. There was also the time he got laughed at by the entire United Nations.
That debate with Biden. Holy shit. I turned it off after 5 minutes. Iâm just so embarrassed by my country.
Cyrus Draeguronly if harris somehow sneaks a bullhorn/megaphone onto the stage so she can still make sure those fuckers hear her when her mic âmalfunctionsâ.
fox deserves no respect.
You know how fascists are always projecting; the way he treats normal news agencies tells us all we need to know - itâs exactly how we SHOULD be treating his pet agencies.
In what sense has he agreed something if no one else involved knows about it? I think the right verb here is âsuggestsâ.
He made a post saying thatâs the âdealâ. In a way itâs a brave way to try and get a venue change. Harris would have to basically insult Fox News and their entire viewership to avoid looking like sheâs walking away.
shani66Which she should do regardless, tbh
If she can go on Fox News and score a couple points against him itâll go very well for her though; going into the proverbial lions den and coming out the other side
No (current) Harris voters are watching Fox News right now, she only stands to gain votes if she handles herself.
Yeah putting this on Fox seems like a super risky move on the Trump campaignâs part, for not that much gain.
Theyâre scared. Nobody get complacent.
It wonât. There is nothing to gain in debating baby Donnie on Fox News.
Gov Newsom destroyed when he was on Fox. I donât think that Fox will repeat their mistake.
Thatâs a quick way to lose an election. Almost like calling people deplorable. That worked great didnât it?
That was one of the very few good things she did. Hilary is just a deeply unlikable person.
Insulting voters is never a good move in an election.
LucidlethargyBrave isnât the right word. Brazen is.
Yeah I canât always with the words.
Again, itâs not a deal if you donât have agreement. Thatâs not a deal, itâs an offer.
I know that and you know that. But do the people who just watch Sinclair News know that?
Thatâs what Trump is doing to ABC right now
And sheâs calling him out in a way I couldnât see happening before. Iâm glad to see it.
This was the obvious move - attempt to change the venue to Fox, Newsmax or worse. Iâm surprised Tucker isnât a proposed moderator.
Harris should counter with a live fact check requirement regardless of venue, which Trump and Fox could never accept.
Even with a live fact check requirement, would you trust Fox News to fact check? Theyâd probably use âalternative factsâ.
Foxâs lie. Whoâd ever believe their news?
0^2I mean foxes do say a lot of things⌠youtu.be/jofNR_WkoCE?si=wmu99UDKpDg5OQk9
The problem is that I let it play even after I saw what it wasâŚ
QuarterSwedeItâs definitely a risk for Harris but itâs the only place anyone watching only Fox will see her debate Trump. Not that itâll change their minds of course, theyâre so heavily brainwashed itâs insane.
Why it should never happen. Trump could go there, shit his pants, and call Harris all the words, and all republicans will lap it up like the mewling little weird cowards they are.
There was no scenario that wasnât going to happen anyway
Todd BonzalezButtigieg has been appearing on Fox News recently and heâs been doing a good job dismissing their dishonest narratives and avoiding their traps.
youtu.be/SXGpXWbVYSg?si=xBtDe8jWbMdXvmUF
But this isnât Buttigieg, and this isnât a one-on-one interview, so we can only hope if she agrees to this for some reason that sheâs as prepared as he is.
People who watch Fox make up a pretty significant portion of every debate's viewership. They don't care what channel it's on, they're going to watch.
Canât spell slaughter without laughter